a for-profit software services contract with the USA Immigration and Customs
Enforcement (ICE)</a>. Activists, including some GitHub employees, have been
calling on GitHub for two years to cancel that contract. GitHub's primary
reply has been that their parent company, Microsoft, has sold Microsoft Word
for years to ICE without any public complaints. They claim that this somehow
justifies <em>even more</em> business with an agency whose policies are
problematic. Regardless of your views on ICE and its behavior, GitHub's
ongoing <a href="https://www.latimes.com/business/technology/story/2020-06-12/github-ceo-black-lives-matter-employees-demand-end-ice-contract">dismissive and disingenuous</a> responses to the activists who raised this important issue show that GitHub puts its profits above concerns from the community.</p></li>
<li><p>While GitHub pretends to be pro-FOSS
(like <a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/17822/">SourceForge before
them</a>), their entire hosting site is, itself, proprietary and/or
trade-secret software. We appreciate that GitHub allows some of its
employees to sometimes contribute FOSS to upstream projects, but our
community has been burned so many times before by companies that claim to
support FOSS, while actively convincing the community to rely on their
proprietary software. We won't let GitHub burn us in this same way!</p></li>
<li><p>GitHub differs from most of its peers in the FOSS project hosting
industry, as GitHub does not even offer any self-hosting FOSS option.
Their <em>entire</em> codebase is secret. For example, while we have our
complaints about GitLab's business model of parallel “Community”
and “Enterprise” editions, at least GitLab's Community Edition
provides basic functionality for self-hosting and is 100% FOSS. Meanwhile,
there are <em>non-profit</em> FOSS hosting sites such
as <a href="https://codeberg.org">CodeBerg</a>, who develop their platform
publicly as FOSS.</p></li>
<li><p>GitHub has long sought to discredit copyleft generally. Their various
CEOs have often spoken loudly and negatively about copyleft, including their