Changeset - c000d6ae6c87
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 9 years ago 2015-03-05 16:31:23
bkuhn@ebb.org
Make this string not so long.
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -26,49 +26,49 @@
 
  <dd>Christoph is one of most active developers of the Linux kernel. He has
 
   contributed 279.653 lines of code to the latest Linux 3.19 kernel, and
 
   thus ranks 20th amongst the 1,340 developers involved in that release.
 
   Christoph also ranks 4th among those who have reviewed third-party source
 
   code, tirelessly corrected and commented on other developers'
 
   contributions.</dd>
 

	
 
  <dt>Are there any court documents to read?</dt>
 

	
 
  <dd>Not currently.  Court proceedings are not public by default in Germany
 
  (unlike in the USA).  Conservancy will continue to update this FAQ with
 
  information that Conservancy knows about the case.  We would all also
 
  welcome an agreement with VMware whereby both sides would agree to publish
 
  all Court documents. </dd>
 

	
 
  <dt>Who is funding this lawsuit?</dt>
 

	
 
  <dd>Conservancy has engaged in a grant agreement with Christoph Hellwig for
 
  the purposes of pursuing this specific legal action in Germany.
 
  Conservancy is funding this legal action specifically as part of
 
  Conservancy's program activity in
 
  its <a href="/linux-compliance/about.html">GPL Compliance
 
  Project for Linux Developers</a>.</dd>
 

	
 
  <dt>Is this the Great Test Case of Combined/Derivative Works?</dt>
 
  <dt>Is this the Great Test Case of Combined / Derivative Works?</dt>
 

	
 
  <dd>This case is specifically regarding a combined work that VMware
 
  allegedly created by combining their own code (&ldquo;vmkernel&rdquo;) with
 
  portions of Linux's code, which was licensed only under GPLv2.  As such,
 
  this, to our knowledge, marks the first time an enforcement case is
 
  exclusively focused on this type of legal question relating to GPL.
 
  However, there are so many different ways to make combined and/or
 
  derivative works that are covered by GPL that no single case could possibly
 
  include all such issues. </dd>
 

	
 
  <dt>Why must you file a lawsuit?  Isn't there any other way to convince
 
    VMware to comply with GPL?</dt>
 

	
 
  <dd><p>Neither Conservancy nor Christoph takes this action lightly nor without
 
  exhausting every other possible alternative first.  This lawsuit is the
 
    outgrowth of years of effort to convince VMware to comply with GPL.</p>
 

	
 
    <p>In October 2011, Conservancy received a GPL violation report on
 
  BusyBox for VMware's ESXi products.  Conservancy opened the matter in its
 
  usual, friendly, and non-confrontational way.  Nevertheless, VMware
 
  immediately referred Conservancy to VMware's outside legal counsel in the
 
  USA, and Conservancy negotiated with VMware's legal counsel throughout
 
  late 2011, 2012 and 2013.  We exchanged and reviewed CCS candidates, and
 
  admittedly, VMware made substantial and good efforts toward compliance on
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)