Changeset - 726b29e9f25b
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 9 years ago 2015-03-05 21:00:53
bkuhn@ebb.org
Link to the larger one.
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -74,81 +74,81 @@
 
  admittedly, VMware made substantial and good efforts toward compliance on
 
  BusyBox.  However, VMware still refused to fix a few minor and one major
 
  compliance problem that we discovered during the process.  Namely, there
 
  was a major violation regarding Linux itself that ultimately became
 
  Christoph's key complaint in this lawsuit.</p>
 

	
 
 <p>Meanwhile, when Conservancy realized in late 2012 there might be a major
 
 Linux violation still present in VMware's ESXi products, Conservancy
 
 representatives sought every industry contact we had for assistance,
 
 including those from trade associations, companies (both competitors and
 
 collaborators with VMware), and everyone else we could think of who might be
 
 able to help us proceed with friendly negotiations that would achieve
 
 compliance.  While we cannot name publicly the people we asked for help
 
 to convince VMware to comply, they include some of the most notable
 
 executives, diplomats, and engineering managers in the Linux community.  No
 
 one was able to assist Conservancy in convincing VMware to comply with the
 
 GPL.  Then, in early 2014, VMware's outside legal counsel in the USA finally
 
 took a clear and hard line with Conservancy stating that they would not
 
 comply with the GPL on Linux and argued (in our view, incorrectly) that they
 
 were already in compliance.</p>
 

	
 
 <p>Conservancy in parallel informed Christoph fully of the details of the
 
   Linux violation on Christoph's copyrights, and based on Conservancy's
 
   findings, Christoph began his own investigation and confirmed
 
   Conservancy's compliance conclusions.  Christoph then began his own
 
   enforcement effort with legal representation from Till Jaeger.  Christoph has
 
   been unable to achieve compliance, either, through his negotiations in
 
   2014.  VMware's last offer was a proposal for a settlement agreement that VMware would
 
   only provide if Christoph signed an NDA, and Christoph chose (quite
 
   reasonably) not to sign an NDA merely to look at the settlement offer.</p>
 

	
 
 <p>Thus, this lawsuit comes after years of negotiations by Conservancy to
 
 achieve compliance &mdash; negotiations that ended in an outright refusal by
 
 VMware's lawyers to comply.  Those events were then followed by a year of
 
   work by Christoph and Till to achieve compliance in a separate action.</p>
 

	
 
 <p>Simply put, Conservancy and Christoph fully exhausted every possible
 
 non-litigation strategy and tactic to convince VMware to do the right thing
 
 before filing this litigation.</p>
 
  </dd>    
 

	
 
  <dt>Can you explain further how VMware incorporated code from Linux into
 
  their kernel?</dt>
 

	
 
  <dd>Conservancy prepared this diagram to show the technical situation as we
 
    understand it.  The diagram compares the technical architecture of a full,
 
    running Linux kernel with a full, running VMware kernel:
 
    <p>
 
      <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_en_scaled.png">
 
      <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_en.png">
 
    <img alt="[Diagram of Linux and VMware running kernels" src="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_en_scaled.png" width="519" height="392" /></a>
 
    </p>
 

	
 
    <p>If you want to download the diagram, it's available
 
    in <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_en.svg">SVG
 
    (English)</a>, <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_en.png">PNG
 
    (English)</a>, <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_de.svg">SVG
 
    (German)</a>, and <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_de.png">PNG
 
    (German)</a>.</p>
 
  </dd>
 

	
 
  <dt>I care about copyleft and the GPL.  How can I help?</dt>
 

	
 
  <dd>Conservancy needs <a href="#donate-box" class="donate-now">your immediate financial
 
  support to proceed with this litigation</a>.  Litigation costs are
 
  unpredictable, and this lawsuit may take years to resolve.  Conservancy is
 
  prepared to fund this case through its conclusion, but we can only do so
 
  with <a href="/supporter/"><em>your</em> support</a>.  If you are an
 
  individual who supports copyleft and wants to see it defended, please
 
  donate now.</dd>
 

	
 
  <dt>Why is the case in Germany?</dt>
 

	
 
  <dd>Copyright infringement claims can be brought anywhere that distribution
 
  of the copyrighted works occur.  VMware distributes ESXi throughout the
 
  world, but Germany is close to Christoph's home and his lawyer was
 
  available to do the litigation work there.  Finally, historically,
 
  Mr. Jaeger's cases in Germany have usually achieved worldwide compliance on
 
  the products at issue in those cases.</dd>
 
  
 
</dl>
 
{% endblock %}
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)