Changeset - 20f2339a1f34
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 9 years ago 2015-03-11 20:15:01
bkuhn@ebb.org
VMware Lawsuit FAQ entry: Why doesn't FSF enforce?

This FAQ and its answer explain why the FSF can't take care of
enforcement for this particular matter.
1 file changed with 17 insertions and 0 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -103,72 +103,89 @@
 
   reasonably) not to sign an NDA merely to look at the settlement offer.</p>
 

	
 
 <p>Thus, this lawsuit comes after years of negotiations by Conservancy to
 
 achieve compliance &mdash; negotiations that ended in an outright refusal by
 
 VMware's lawyers to comply.  Those events were then followed by a year of
 
   work by Christoph and Till to achieve compliance in a separate action.</p>
 

	
 
 <p>Simply put, Conservancy and Christoph fully exhausted every possible
 
 non-litigation strategy and tactic to convince VMware to do the right thing
 
 before filing this litigation.</p>
 
  </dd>    
 

	
 
  <dt>Can you explain further how VMware incorporated code from Linux into
 
  their kernel?</dt>
 

	
 
  <dd>Conservancy prepared this diagram to show the technical situation as we
 
    understand it.  The diagram compares the technical architecture of a full,
 
    running Linux kernel with a full, running VMware kernel:
 
    <p>
 
      <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_en.png">
 
    <img class="inside-faq" alt="[Diagram of Linux and VMware running kernels]" src="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_en_scaled.png" /></a>
 
    </p>
 

	
 
    <p>If you want to download the diagram, it's available
 
    in <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_en.svg">SVG
 
    (English)</a>, <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_en.png">PNG
 
    (English)</a>, <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_de.svg">SVG
 
    (German)</a>, and <a href="/linux-compliance/linux-vs-vmkernel_de.png">PNG
 
    (German)</a>.</p>
 
  </dd>
 

	
 
  <dt>Have others issued statements of support about this action?</dt>
 
  <dd>Various individuals and groups have publicly stated their support for
 
    Conservancy's and Hellwig's actions in this matter.  They include:
 
    <ul>
 
        <li><a href="https://fsf.org/news/conservancy-and-christoph-hellwig-gpl-enforcement-lawsuit">Free
 
            Software Foundation</a></li>
 
        <li><a href="https://samba.org/samba/news/announcements/2015-03-06_vmware_lawsuit.html">The
 
            Samba Team</a></li>
 
        <li><a href="https://plus.google.com/104877287288155269055/posts/cHgyreA76yY">Dave Airlie, Linux Developer</a></li>
 
        <li><a href="https://twitter.com/mjg59/status/573530001758294016">Matthew Garrett, Linux Developer</a></li>
 
        <li><a href="/news/2015/mar/05/vmware-lawsuit/#glikely">Grant Likely, Linux Kernel Engineer</a></li>
 
        <li><a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/635624/">Luis R. Rodriguez (aka mcgrof), Linux Developer</a></li>
 
        <li><a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/635855/">Wolfram Sang, Linux Developer</a></li>
 
        <li><a href="https://lwn.net/Articles/635617/">Rik van Riel, Linux Developer</a></li>
 
    </ul>
 
  </dd>
 

	
 
<dt>I
 
see <a href="https://fsf.org/news/conservancy-and-christoph-hellwig-gpl-enforcement-lawsuit">FSF's
 
statement of support</a>, but why
 
isn't <a href="https://www.fsf.org/licensing/compliance">FSF enforcing</a> in
 
this case?</dt>
 

	
 
<dd>While FSF are the authors and license steward of the GNU GPL, it's up to
 
the copyright holder to enforce GPL.  VMware created an operating system by
 
combining parts of the kernel named Linux with their own proprietary code,
 
and then added BusyBox to provide the userspace operating system components.
 
As such, ESXi is not
 
a <a href="https://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html">traditional GNU/Linux
 
system</a>.  FSF has many copyrights of its own, but these are almost
 
exclusively on various parts of the GNU system, not on the kernel, Linux.  As
 
such, FSF probably does not have copyright interests available to directly
 
enforce the GPL regarding the primary issue in this case.</dd>
 

	
 
  <dt><em>I</em> care about copyleft and the GPL.  How can I help?</dt>
 

	
 
  <dd>Conservancy needs <a href="#donate-box" class="donate-now">your immediate financial
 
  support to proceed with this litigation</a>.  Litigation costs are
 
  unpredictable, and this lawsuit may take years to resolve.  Conservancy is
 
  prepared to fund this case through its conclusion, but we can only do so
 
  with <a href="/supporter/"><em>your</em> support</a>.  If you are an
 
  individual who supports copyleft and wants to see it defended, please
 
  donate now.  And, if you make a public statement of support, please email the
 
  URL
 
  to <a href="mailto:info@sfconservancy.org">&lt;info@sfconservancy.org&gt;</a>,
 
  as we'd like to include representative selection of supportive statements above.</dd>
 

	
 
  <dt>Why is the case in Germany?</dt>
 

	
 
  <dd>Copyright infringement claims can be brought anywhere that distribution
 
  of the copyrighted works occur.  VMware distributes ESXi throughout the
 
  world, but Germany is close to Christoph's home and his lawyer was
 
  available to do the litigation work there.  Finally, historically,
 
  Mr. Jaeger's cases in Germany have usually achieved worldwide compliance on
 
  the products at issue in those cases.</dd>
 
  
 
</dl>
 
{% endblock %}
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)