Changeset - 81c9590df66e
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley M. Kuhn - 4 years ago 2020-07-17 20:58:58
bkuhn@sfconservancy.org
Copyleft: rename to "Strategic GPL Enforcement Initiative"
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
www/conservancy/static/copyleft-compliance/enforcement-strategy.html
Show inline comments
 
{% extends "base_compliance.html" %}
 
{% block subtitle %}Copyleft Compliance Projects - {% endblock %}
 
{% block submenuselection %}EnforcementStrategy{% endblock %}
 
{% block content %}
 

	
 
<h1 id="software-freedom-conservancy-proposal-for-gpl-enforcement-grant">History and Future Strategy</h1>
 
<h1 id="strategic-gpl-enforcement-initiative">The Strategic GPL Enforcement Initiative</h1>
 

	
 
<p>As existing donors and supporters know, the Software Freedom Conservancy
 
  is a 501(c)(3) non-profit charity registered in New York, and Conservancy
 
  helps people take control of their computing by growing the software
 
  freedom movement, supporting community-driven alternatives to proprietary
 
  software, and defending free software with practical initiatives.
 
  Conservancy accomplishes these goals with various initiatives, including
 
  defending and upholding the rights of software users and consumers under
 
  copyleft licenses, such as the GPL.</p>
 

	
 
<h2 id="brief-history-of-user-focused-gpl-enforcement">Brief History of
 
  User-Focused GPL Enforcement</h2>
 

	
 
<p>The spring of 2003 was a watershed moment for software freedom on
 
  electronic devices. 802.11 wireless technology had finally reached the
 
  mainstream, and wireless routers for home use had flooded the market
 
  earlier in the year. By June
 
  2003, <a href="https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/03/06/08/1749217/is-linksys-violating-the-GPL">the
 
  general public knew that Linksys (a division of Cisco) was violating the
 
  GPL</a> on their WRT54G model wireless routers. Hobbyists discovered
 
  (rather easily) that Linux and BusyBox were included in the router, but
 
  Linksys and Cisco had failed to provide source code or any offer for source
 
  code to its customers.</p>
 

	
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)