Changeset - 2f447979923a
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Martin Michlmayr (tbm) - 9 years ago 2015-03-05 19:19:37
tbm@cyrius.com
A missing word
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -97,13 +97,13 @@
 
   findings, Christoph began his own investigation and confirmed
 
   Conservancy's compliance conclusions.  Christoph then began his own
 
   enforcement effort with legal representation from Till Jaeger.  Christoph has
 
   been unable to achieve compliance, either, through his negotiations in
 
   2014.  VMware's last offer was a proposal for a settlement agreement that VMware would
 
   only provide if Christoph signed an NDA, and Christoph chose (quite
 
   reasonably) not to sign an NDA merely to look at settlement offer.</p>
 
   reasonably) not to sign an NDA merely to look at the settlement offer.</p>
 

	
 
 <p>Thus, this lawsuit comes after years of negotiations by Conservancy to
 
 achieve compliance &mdash; negotiations that ended in an outright refusal by
 
 VMware's lawyers to comply.  Those events were then followed by a year of
 
   work by Christoph and Till to achieve compliance in a separate action.</p>
 

	
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)