From 90cf11f1c24150d334d769d576bcec942574a281 2015-03-05 18:39:57 From: Bradley M. Kuhn Date: 2015-03-05 18:39:57 Subject: [PATCH] Sure up wording for ambiguous modifier HT jackhill for this suggestion. --- diff --git a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-appeal.html b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-appeal.html index e535b6cd48e45df3f627d8d19321ce36b96ac30d..1c7d429a0877d642fa378de71f91948539da864b 100644 --- a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-appeal.html +++ b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-appeal.html @@ -48,9 +48,8 @@ there's no way a company can compete without using a significant amount of free software to bring products to market in reasonable time. They get so much benefit from our work. Allowing the whole community to review, use, improve and work with the code seems very little to ask in return. Copyleft -also ensures competitors cannot undercut those who contribute. The GPL is -effectively no different from a non-copyleft license without active -enforcement.

+also ensures competitors cannot undercut those who contribute. Without active enforcement, the GPL is +effectively no different from a non-copyleft license.

What point is there for companies to make sure that they're compliant if there are no consequences when the GPL is violated? Many will continue to