From 39584e54f90210350013a3cda7c87ead7465e8ad 2015-03-17 02:37:50
From: Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@ebb.org>
Date: 2015-03-17 02:37:50
Subject: [PATCH] Wordsmith this new FAQ entry.

---

diff --git a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
index 4e01495768b2679813bf15290c048aad49ec7f09..015d465d7f1713a12c88bfdc6be5484847a530b0 100644
--- a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
+++ b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
@@ -181,13 +181,14 @@ Code, and for which (at least some) source code is provided.
     modifications to &ldquo;vmkernel&rdquo; in a tightly coupled manner.</p>
     </dd>
 
-   <dt id="shim-meaningless">Wait, is Conservancy proposing that a
-      &ldquo;shim&rdquo; layer is a viable solution for VMware to comply with
-      GPL?</dt>
-
-    <dd>No, in fact, as we say above, Conservancy doesn't think the
-        phrase 'shim layer' has any meaning, despite its regular use in the
-        media.</dd>
+   <dt id="shim-meaningless">Is Conservancy proposing a &ldquo;shim
+      layer&rdquo; as a viable solution for GPL compliance?</dt>
+
+    <dd>No, in fact, as we say above, Conservancy doesn't think the phrase
+        &ldquo;shim layer&rdquo; has any meaning, despite regular use of that
+        phrase in the media.  Conservancy generally doubts there is any
+        technological manipulation that changes the outcome of a
+        combined/derivative work analysis.</dd>
 
     <dt>Can you give a <em>specific</em> example, with code, showing how
     VMware combined Linux source code with their binary-only components?</dt>