From 01b0b090a399083d05364b2266a9f46dd3663353 2015-06-01 03:53:01
From: Denver Gingerich <denver@ossguy.com>
Date: 2015-06-01 03:53:01
Subject: [PATCH] List previously analyzed versions in lawsuit FAQ.

---

diff --git a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
index 0da1f8a18e4f7346f29104680fe5f5055eac967b..0b3398e58bc95281070a69e151ea90848089090b 100644
--- a/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
+++ b/www/conservancy/static/linux-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
@@ -433,7 +433,8 @@ static struct pci_driver tg3_driver = {
     </ul>
 <p>The above is but one piece of evidence among many, but hopefully it helps
   to explain some of the &ldquo;combined work&rdquo; violations found in
-  VMware's ESXi product.</p>
+  VMware's ESXi product.  Conservancy did a similar analysis for ESXi 5.0
+  as well as ESXi 5.5 Update 2 and found nearly identical results.</p>
 
 <dt id="verify">How can I verify Conservancy's technical findings above?</dt>