diff --git a/www/conservancy/static/copyleft-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html b/www/conservancy/static/copyleft-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
index 1c5afc809eead0651233a356b23cc11175d43ac1..fc1657dcb7fa3ee2cd742a1eaca4e441fada776f 100644
--- a/www/conservancy/static/copyleft-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
+++ b/www/conservancy/static/copyleft-compliance/vmware-lawsuit-faq.html
@@ -568,6 +568,34 @@ at <code>bin/vmtar</code> inside
   downloading the software and/or engaging in the process that Conservancy
   discusses above.</p>
 
+<dt id="similarity-analysis">How do you know Christoph's code is present in
+  VMware's work?</dt>
+
+<dd>Conservancy
+published <a href="/linux-compliance/vmware-code-similarity.html">its
+comparison analysis between Christoph's code and VMware's code</a>. This
+particular analysis uses a two step process: (a) use Linux's public Git logs
+to find Christoph's contributions from Christoph, and (b) use a widely
+accepted and heavily academically cited tool, CCFinderX, to show that VMware
+copied Christoph's code into their product.</dd>
+
+<dt id="appeal">I heard that Christoph's case was dismissed.  Is that
+  true?</dt>
+
+  <dd>There was a ruling in July 2016 in the Hamburg District Court, which
+    dismissed Christoph's case against VMware.  The ruling concerned German
+    evidence law and the Court did not rule on the merits of the case. The
+    ruling centered around German evidentary rules related to documenting
+    Christoph's contributions that appear in VMware's product.
+    In <a href="http://bombadil.infradead.org/~hch/vmware/2016-08-09.html">a
+    statement on his website</a>, Christoph Hellwig announced that he will
+    appeal the ruling. Christoph also published
+    (in <a href="http://bombadil.infradead.org/~hch/vmware/Urteil_2016-07-08.pdf">German</a>
+    and <a href="http://bombadil.infradead.org/~hch/vmware/Judgment_2016-07-08.pdf">English)
+    the Court's ruling</a> which explains why the materials submitted did not
+    satisfy German evidence rules &mdash; despite publicly available
+    information in Linux's Git repositories. In addition, the Court chose not
+    to seek expert testimony.</dd>
   <dt id="statements-of-support">Have others issued statements of support about this action?</dt>
   <dd>Various individuals and groups have publicly stated their support for
     Conservancy's and Hellwig's actions in this matter.  They include: