policies Changeset - b36d3820b41c · Conservancy Kallithea

Changeset - b36d3820b41c

Parent rev.

Child rev.

[Not reviewed]

0 1 0

Tony Sebro (keynote2k) - 12 years ago 2012-03-05 17:52:40
tony@sfconservancy.org

- edited "competitive bids" language to broaden scope from software developers to all "technical service contractors."
- made a few grammatical and wording changes to the section re: Community Members' (lack of) influence over a Project's technical direction

1 file changed with 12 insertions and 13 deletions:

Conflicts/conflict-of-interest-policy.txt

0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)

Conflicts/conflict-of-interest-policy.txt

➞

Show inline comments

@@ ... @@
 Notwithstanding the above, Conservancy acknowledges that many PLC
 Persons are software developers who can provide professional services
 useful to advance computing and contribute to Conservancy's mission.
 Persons are technical service contractors (e.g., software developers, documentation writers, website developers, etc.) who can provide professional services useful to advance computing and contribute to Conservancy's mission.
 In many instances, a PLC Person will have the strongest mix of credentials,
-experience, and interest and availability to fulfill a software development
+experience, and interest and availability to fulfill a technical service
 contract desired by Conservancy and/or a Project. To address those
@@ ... @@
 * *Drafting the Software Development Proposal.* PLCs must draft
 a written proposal for every software development project their Project
 * *Drafting the Technical Service Proposal.* PLCs must draft
 a written proposal for every technical service project their Project
 wishes to fund. During the drafting process, if a PLC Person (or his
@@ ... @@
 of PLC Person's employer wish to be considered a candidate to fulfill
-the funded software development contract, that PLC Person has a conflict
+the funded technical service contract, that PLC Person has a conflict
 of interest and must recuse herself or himself from the proposal drafting
@@ ... / @@ -313,3 +312,3 @@ in the minutes of the next PLC meeting. @@
 * *Selecting a PLC Person to Fulfill a Contract.* Once a PLC
-has drafted and approved a development proposal, the PLC is free to
+has drafted and approved a technical service proposal, the PLC is free to
 consider qualified candidates to fulfill the funded contract. If the
@@ ... / @@ -320,3 +319,3 @@ to carry out the work, the following criteria must be met: @@
 Executive Director (or designee) with a suggested compensation (converted
-into an hourly wage) for the software developer to be retained to
+into an hourly wage) for the technical service contractor to be retained to
 fulfill the funded contract.
@@ ... / @@ -330,3 +329,3 @@ to fulfill the funded contract. @@
 acknowledge that Conservancy retains the right to ask for bids from
-software developers in addition to PLC Person to fulfill a given contract.
+technical service contractors in addition to PLC Person to fulfill a given contract.
 Should that instance arise, Conservancy's Executive Director (or designee)
@@ ... @@
 any conflicts, PLCs must not engage in any pre-negotiation with prospective
 contractors -- including PLC Persons -- beyond collecting the terms
 of the developer(s)' bid.
 technical service contractors -- including PLC Persons -- beyond collecting the terms
 of the technical service contractor(s)' bid.
@@ ... / @@ -355,4 +354,4 @@ authority rests with the PLCs and/or Conservancy. @@
 * *Community Members Cannot Direct Funds.* Community Members
 are free to offer suggestions and engage in open dialogue with PLC,
 key developers regarding a Project's technical direction. However,
 are free to offer suggestions and engage in open dialogue with PLCs and/or
 key developers and architects regarding a Project's technical direction. However,
 each PLC and Conservancy must together maintain sole and final control

0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)