Changeset - 873f61994ca0
[Not reviewed]
0 2 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 9 years ago 2013-11-19 20:33:36
Updated ERPNext to not be a full rejection.

I'm about to send an email to their list on the subject.
2 files changed with 21 insertions and 7 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
Show inline comments
@@ -30,2 +30,13 @@ evaluate these projects to the UseCases we've collected so far.

## Projects Temporarily Rejected
<a id="temp-reject"></a>

These projects have been rejected temporarily (i.e., evaluation is on hold)
because of some issue that seems unresolvable at the moment, but may be
resolved at a later date and will remove the blocker of looking more closely
at the project.

* [[ExistingProjects/ERPNext#final-eval]]
   * [The policy is problematic]( for various reasons.
## Projects Rejected
@@ -46,8 +57 @@ linked page.
 -- Reinhard Mueller
* [[ExistingProjects/ERPNext]] 
> Unless otherwise asserted in the code files, Web Notes will own the copyright of all contributions too. That means Web Notes holds the rights to change the license in the future or offer Commercial Licenses. 
> Web Notes will only accept copyright assertions in case of a significant contribution like a whole new functionality or a major rewrite. We believe if your contribution is significant then you should have a say in what license Web Notes selects in the future and/or have a right to any revenue Web Notes gets from a Commercial License. Either ways Web Notes will have the right to decide what is a "significant" contribution. 
> Note: At the moment, Web Notes does not give Commercial License for ERPNext nor has specific plans do so in the future.  
> -- <></p></blockquote>
Show inline comments
@@ -78 +78,11 @@ does, so I think it's tough to do it as a list of questions.
- Is the [[license GPL-compatible||USeCases/CommunityHealth#gpl-compatible]]?

## Final(-ish) Evaluation
<a id="final-eval"></a>

Unfortunately, we discovered
[this policy early in our evaluation](,
and decided that until this policy can be corrected to something more fitting
with actual copyright law and that will allow us to contribute under the
stated license of the project, it's not worth further evaluation of the codebase,
since this policy is just not acceptable.
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)