Changeset - 0c9d4a66f255
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
https://www.google.com/accounts/o8/id?id=AItOawkMQCvnof0tMtqHEvidSje0I4Ah_T0mlOo Chris@web - 10 years ago 2013-12-12 01:36:49

1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
ExistingProjects/LedgerSMB.mdwn
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -66,13 +66,13 @@ Note that for 1.4 and the backport, reporting dimension units can be limited by
 
- [[Funds as part of whole org View|UseCases/FundAccounting#fundless-view]] Not sure about this one.  Right now one would have to run a single report for every relevant fund.
 
- [[Ignore Funds for operations|UseCases/FundAccounting#fundless-view]] Attaching a transaction to a fund (or project, or department, etc) is optional with the 1.4 code (or backport).
 

	
 
### [[UseCases/Collaborating]] evaluation
 
- [[Simultaneous Editing of Ledger|UseCases/Collaborating#simultaneous-ledger-edits]]: Do you mean simultaneous entry?  Yes, that is fully supported.  Do you mean simultaneous other operations (like entry and reconciliation)?  Yes.  However we try very hard to avoid editing existing entries.  This is hardly supported except in a few edge cases of non-approved transactions (which have not hit the books). 
 

	
 
- FIXME: Other uses cases need rewrite.
 
- Developer's note: Financial logic slated for rewrite with basic API's doable in an afternoon.
 

	
 
### Evaluation of [[Double-entry Accounting|UseCases/DoubleEntryAccounting]] UseCases
 

	
 
- Does the system implement pure double-entry accounting?  Yes.
 

	
 
### Evaluation of [[TrackingDocumentation|UseCases/TrackingDocumentation]] UseCases
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)