### Evaluation of the [[Community Health|USeCases/CommunityHealth]]

- Is the [[license both determined as Free Software by FSF and OSI-approved|USeCases/CommunityHealth#license-approved]]?

- Is the [[license GPL-compatible||USeCases/CommunityHealth#gpl-compatible]]?

- [[Health Assessment of the Development Community|UseCases/CommunityHealth]]

# Health of the Development Community

## Good License Choice

<a id="license-approved"></a>

Obviously, code that's not under a license that is both

[OSI approved](http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) and is not

[approved by FSF as a Free Software license](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses)

is completely useless to us.

<a id="gpl-compatible"></a>

It would also be quite preferable if the code were under a

[a license that FSF has determined is GPL-compatible](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses),

so that code from GPL'd projects can be easily shared and GPL'd applications

can be built on top of anything we build.  Code not under a GPL-compatible

license would face a high burden (i.e., the code would really have to be

absolutely wonderful in all other respects) to dictate such a license choice.