From ea3eac041349bec0229c40dc9802e72622991158 2013-11-15 17:01:25
From: Bradley M. Kuhn <bkuhn@ebb.org>
Date: 2013-11-15 17:01:25
Subject: [PATCH] Notes about RDF in the StorageAPI UseCase.

---

diff --git a/UseCases/StorageAPI.mdwn b/UseCases/StorageAPI.mdwn
index cf19afe280d31ed272a7d127bf54c32cffd7c9a8..6e3f1487e9c82fc2ffbf1c9d2c273b37bd0539a9 100644
--- a/UseCases/StorageAPI.mdwn
+++ b/UseCases/StorageAPI.mdwn
@@ -65,3 +65,14 @@ Entries have the following fields:
 
 Each entry has a globally unique identifier that does not change after its
 first creation.
+
+# Storage in RDF
+<a id="rdf"></a>
+It was suggested on the
+[mailing list that RDF might be an interesting format to explore for representation of the stored data](http://lists.sfconservancy.org/pipermail/npo-accounting/2013q4/000097.html).
+This idea might be worth exploring, but the open question is whether or not
+the StorageAPI needs to specify a specific format?
+
+Regarding this, review of
+[Up The Asset](https://github.com/zacharyvoase/uptheasset) and
+[3account](https://code.google.com/p/3account/) might be useful.