diff --git a/ExistingProjects/EvaluationTemplate.mdwn b/ExistingProjects/EvaluationTemplate.mdwn
index 32cc134018eb5e1b7344442416436dfecfe89a80..117558509e361f4b878b31d762b522a94b56b103 100644
--- a/ExistingProjects/EvaluationTemplate.mdwn
+++ b/ExistingProjects/EvaluationTemplate.mdwn
@@ -64,3 +64,7 @@ data does, so I think it's tough to do it as a list of questions.
 
 FIXME: This is assessment of what the API for storing the accounting data
 does, so I think it's tough to do it as a list of questions.
+
+### Evaluation of the [[Community Health|USeCases/CommunityHealth]]
+- Is the [[license both determined as Free Software by FSF and OSI-approved|USeCases/CommunityHealth#license-approved]]?
+- Is the [[license GPL-compatible||USeCases/CommunityHealth#gpl-compatible]]?
diff --git a/UseCases.mdwn b/UseCases.mdwn
index 1be735a373b31496b41d9829b368f0a4de0c3cb7..cb6b69a88faeea99fbe2338a4f0061952b33019c 100644
--- a/UseCases.mdwn
+++ b/UseCases.mdwn
@@ -36,3 +36,4 @@ criteria in evaluating ExistingProjects, then please make sure to update the
 
 - [[Reading and Reporting API|UseCases/ReadingAPI]]
 - [[Storage API|UseCases/StorageAPI]]
+- [[Health Assessment of the Development Community|UseCases/CommunityHealth]]
diff --git a/UseCases/CommunityHealth.mdwn b/UseCases/CommunityHealth.mdwn
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..56083dea57f11c4cf34183fc56f2d3f81f4e6f6c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/UseCases/CommunityHealth.mdwn
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+# Health of the Development Community
+
+## Good License Choice
+
+<a id="license-approved"></a>
+Obviously, code that's not under a license that is both
+[OSI approved](http://opensource.org/licenses/alphabetical) and is not
+[approved by FSF as a Free Software license](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#SoftwareLicenses)
+is completely useless to us.
+
+<a id="gpl-compatible"></a>
+It would also be quite preferable if the code were under a
+[a license that FSF has determined is GPL-compatible](http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#GPLCompatibleLicenses),
+so that code from GPL'd projects can be easily shared and GPL'd applications
+can be built on top of anything we build.  Code not under a GPL-compatible
+license would face a high burden (i.e., the code would really have to be
+absolutely wonderful in all other respects) to dictate such a license choice.
+