NPO-Accounting/conservancy_beancount Changeset - 80dace59b385

Changeset - 80dace59b385

Parent rev.

Child rev.

[Not reviewed]

1 0 1

Ben Sturmfels (bsturmfels) - 2 years ago 2022-02-22 21:18:52
ben@sturm.com.au

reconcile: Rename statement reconciler.

1 file changed with 7 insertions and 0 deletions:

conservancy_beancount/reconcile/statement_reconciler.py

0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)

conservancy_beancount/reconcile/statement_reconciler.py

➞

Show inline comments

 file renamed from conservancy_beancount/reconcile/prototype_amex_reconciler.py to conservancy_beancount/reconcile/statement_reconciler.py
@@ ... / @@ -218,6 +218,8 @@ def records_match(r1: Dict, r2: Dict) -> Tuple[bool, str]: @@
     # We never consider payee if there's a check_id in the books.
     check_message = ''
     payee_message = ''
     # Sometimes we get unrelated numbers in the statement column with check-ids,
     # so we can't match based on the existence of a statement check-id.
     if r2['check_id']:
         payee_score = 0.0
         if r1['check_id'] and r2['check_id'] and r1['check_id'] == r2['check_id']:
@@ ... @@
     # items.
     books_trans = list(books_trans)
     # We can delete the matched books trans, but seems not a good idea to delete
     # while iterating through statement_trans. Instead pushing onto a separate
     # list.
     remaining_statement_trans = []
     for r1 in statement_trans:
         best_match_score = 0
         best_match_index = None

0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)