NPO-Accounting/conservancy_beancount Changeset - 3dfe2669455b

Changeset - 3dfe2669455b

Parent rev.

Child rev.

[Not reviewed]

0 2 0

Brett Smith - 4 years ago 2020-04-07 19:31:58
brettcsmith@brettcsmith.org

meta_payable_documentation: Bugfix which metadata we're checking.

Checking approval/contract was in the original specification,
looking at invoice instead of approval was a pure brain fart.

2 files changed with 4 insertions and 4 deletions:

conservancy_beancount/plugin/meta_payable_documentation.py

tests/test_meta_payable_documentation.py

0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)

conservancy_beancount/plugin/meta_payable_documentation.py

➞

Show inline comments

@@ ... / @@ -25,3 +25,3 @@ from ..beancount_types import ( @@
 class MetaPayableDocumentation(core._RequireLinksPostingMetadataHook):
-    CHECKED_METADATA = ['invoice', 'contract']
+    CHECKED_METADATA = ['approval', 'contract']

tests/test_meta_payable_documentation.py

➞

Show inline comments

@@ ... / @@ -31,4 +31,4 @@ ACCOUNTS = [ @@
 SUPPORTING_METADATA = [
     'approval',
     'contract',
     'invoice',
+]
@@ ... / @@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ SUPPORTING_METADATA = [ @@
 NON_SUPPORTING_METADATA = [
     'approval',
     'check',
     'invoice',
     'purchase-order',
@@ ... / @@ -44,3 +44,3 @@ NON_SUPPORTING_METADATA = [ @@
 OTHER_ACCT = 'Expenses:Other'
-MISSING_MSG = f"{{}} missing invoice/contract".format
+MISSING_MSG = f"{{}} missing approval/contract".format

0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)