diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index af6b317d2a5e52dcf221071bb448b627a88e1b65..b05e281b387641c176b793de8c44881a1a903a30 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -2270,28 +2270,34 @@ In short, GPLv2~\S6 says that your license for the software is your one and
 only copyright license allowing you to copy, modify and distribute the
 software.
 
-% FIXME-URGENT: integrate
-%   Also, link to GPLv3 section
-
-This is GPLv2’s ``automatic downstream licensing'' provision. Each time you
+GPLv2~\S6 is GPLv2’s ``automatic downstream licensing''
+provision\footnote{This section was substantially expanded for clarity and
+  detail in \hyperref[GPLv3s10]{GPLv3~\S10}..  Each time you
 redistribute a GPL’d program, the recipient automatically receives a license
 from each original licensor to copy, distribute or modify the program subject
-to the conditions of the license. There is no requirement to take any action
-to ensure the downstream recipient’s acceptance of the license terms, see
-above. This places every copyright holder in the chain of descent of the code
+to the conditions of the license.  The redistributor need not take any
+to ensure the downstream recipient’s acceptance of the license terms.
+This places every copyright holder in the chain of descent of the code
 in legal privity, or direct relationship, with every downstream
-redistributor. Two legal effects follow. First, as \S6 says, parties
-themselves remaining in compliance have valid permissions for all actions
-including modification and redistribution even if their immediate upstream
-supplier of the software has been terminated for license violation. Their
+redistributor.  Two legal effects follow.  First, downstream parties
+who remain in compliance have valid permissions for all actions
+(including modification and redistribution) even if their immediate upstream
+supplier of the software has been terminated for license
+violation\footnote{While this is legally true, as a practical matter, a
+  failure of ``complete, corresponding source'' (CCS) provisioning by an
+  upstream could make it effectively impossible for a downstream party to
+  engage in a commercial redistribution pursuant to
+  \hyperref[GPLv2s3]{GPLv2~\S3(a--b)}.  (\S~\ref{upstream} in the Compliance
+  Guide portion of this tutorial discussed related details.)}.
+Downstream's
 licensed rights are not dependent on compliance of their upstream, because
-their licenses issue directly from the copyright holder. Second, automatic
+their licenses issue directly from the copyright holder.  Second, automatic
 termination cannot be cured by obtaining additional copies from an alternate
 supplier: the license permissions emanate only from the original licensors,
 and if they have automatically terminated permission, no act by any
-intermediate license holder can restore those terminated rights.
+intermediate license holder can restore those terminated
+rights.
 
-%FIXME-URGENT: end
 \section{GPLv2~\S7: ``Give Software Liberty or Give It Death!''}
 \label{GPLv2s7}
 
