diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index 194654114600b698fd27c7552104413e21bc1cc7..9d7e963d2a4a332b05fcde4a2fa9d74da35b0205 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -3705,13 +3705,19 @@ classes of patent commitments.
 Specifically, the ideal might have been for GPLv3 to feature a patent license
 grant triggered by all acts of distribution of GPLv3-covered works.  The FSF
 considered it during the GPLv3 drafting process, but many patent-holding
-companies objected to this policy.  They have made two objections: (1) the
+companies objected to this policy.  They have made two objections:
+
+\begin{enumerate}
+    \item the
 far-reaching impact of the patent license grant on the patent holder is
 disproportionate to the act of merely distributing code without modification
-or transformation, and (2) it is unreasonable to expect an owner of vast
+or transformation, and
+
+    \item it is unreasonable to expect an owner of vast
 patent assets to exercise requisite diligence in reviewing all the
 GPL-covered software that it provides to others.  Some expressed particular
 concern about the consequences of ``inadvertent'' distribution.
+\end{enumerate}
 
 The argument that the impact of the patent license grant would be
 ``disproportionate'',  that is to say unfair, is not valid. Since
