diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index 1c6a3c64011d78fd16b449789417cf19b40fe2bc..90807ebd6868d22c034c30b828fe7be1b4e0077e 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -195,14 +195,12 @@ activities are considered non-free.  The Open Source Initiative
 (\defn{OSI}) (the arbiter of what is considered ``Open Source'') also regards
 such licenses as inconsistent with its ``Open Source Definition''.
 
-In general, software for which any of these freedoms are
-restricted in any way is called ``nonfree'' (or as I prefer to write it, ``non-Free'') software.  Some use the
-term ``proprietary software'' more or less interchangeably with
-``non-Free software.''  Personally, I tend to use the term ``non-Free
-software'' to refer to software available noncommercially that restricts freedom
-(such as ``shareware'') and ``proprietary software'' to refer to
-commercial software that restricts freedom (such as nearly all of
-Microsoft's and Oracle's offerings).
+In general, software for which any of these freedoms are restricted in any
+way is called ``nonfree'' software.  Some use the term ``proprietary
+software'' more or less interchangeably with ``nonfree software''.  The FSF
+published a useful
+\href{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html}{explanation of various
+  types of software and how they relate to one another}.
 
 Keep in mind that none of the terms ``software freedom'', ``open source''
 and ``free software'' are known to be trademarked or otherwise legally
