diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index 7acc98202e1677397058680fa3b4883f78dff002..4118a8ab52724385fc6d3819ab9f2888f3054d49 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -3696,34 +3696,34 @@ No substantive changes have been made in sections 15 and 16.
 
 % FIXME-LATER: more, plus 17
 
-% FIXME: Section header needed here about choice of law.
-
-% FIXME: reword into tutorial
-
-Some have asked us to address the difficulties of internationalization
-by including, or permitting the inclusion of, a choice of law
-provision.  We maintain that this is the wrong approach.  Free
-software licenses should not contain choice of law clauses, for both
-legal and pragmatic reasons.  Choice of law clauses are creatures of
-contract, but the substantive rights granted by the GPL are defined
-under applicable local copyright law. Contractual free software
-licenses can operate only to diminish these rights.  Choice of law
-clauses also raise complex questions of interpretation when works of
-software are created by combination and extension.  There is also the
-real danger that a choice of law clause will specify a jurisdiction
-that is hostile to free software principles.
-
-% FIXME: reword into tutorial, \ref to section 7.
-
-Our revised version of section 7 makes explicit our view that the
-inclusion of a choice of law clause by a licensee is the imposition of
-an additional requirement in violation of the GPL.  Moreover, if a
-program author or copyright holder purports to supplement the GPL with
-a choice of law clause, section 7 now permits any licensee to remove
-that clause.
-
-
-% FIXME: does this need to be a section, describing how it was out then in
+% FIXME-LATER: Section header needed here about choice of law.
+
+% FIXME-LATER: reword into tutorial
+
+%% Some have asked us to address the difficulties of internationalization
+%% by including, or permitting the inclusion of, a choice of law
+%% provision.  We maintain that this is the wrong approach.  Free
+%% software licenses should not contain choice of law clauses, for both
+%% legal and pragmatic reasons.  Choice of law clauses are creatures of
+%% contract, but the substantive rights granted by the GPL are defined
+%% under applicable local copyright law. Contractual free software
+%% licenses can operate only to diminish these rights.  Choice of law
+%% clauses also raise complex questions of interpretation when works of
+%% software are created by combination and extension.  There is also the
+%% real danger that a choice of law clause will specify a jurisdiction
+%% that is hostile to free software principles.
+
+%% % FIXME-LATER: reword into tutorial, \ref to section 7.
+
+%% Our revised version of section 7 makes explicit our view that the
+%% inclusion of a choice of law clause by a licensee is the imposition of
+%% an additional requirement in violation of the GPL.  Moreover, if a
+%% program author or copyright holder purports to supplement the GPL with
+%% a choice of law clause, section 7 now permits any licensee to remove
+%% that clause.
+
+
+% FIXME-LATER: does this need to be a section, describing how it was out then in
 % then out then in? :)
 
 Finally, the FSF shortened the section on ``How to Apply These