diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index ae40556d8360dc8207d475f281eb5b5edb8701b8..df9614e0300d57cd83b9237e5fcbe74fba85bdee 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -1010,7 +1010,7 @@ access is and should remain unregulated and unrestricted.
 \medskip
 
 Thus, the GPLv2 protects users fair and unregulated use rights precisely by
-not attempting to cover them. Furthermore, the GPLv2 ensures the freedom
+not attempting to cover them.  Furthermore, the GPLv2 ensures the freedom
 to run specifically by stating the following:
 \begin{quote}
 ''The act of running the Program is not restricted.''
@@ -1020,21 +1020,21 @@ Thus, users are explicitly given the freedom to run by \S 0.
 \medskip
 
 The bulk of \S 0 not yet discussed gives definitions for other terms used
-throughout. The only one worth discussing in detail is ``work based on
-the Program.''  The reason this definition is particularly interesting is
+throughout.  The only one worth discussing in detail is ``work based on
+the Program''.  The reason this definition is particularly interesting is
 not for the definition itself, which is rather straightforward, but
 because it clears up a common misconception about the GPL\@.
 
 The GPL is often mistakenly criticized because it fails to give a
-definition of ``derivative work.''  In fact, it would be incorrect and
-problematic if the GPL attempted to define this. A copyright license, in
-fact, has no control over what may or may not be a derivative work. This
-matter is left up to copyright law, not the licenses that utilize it.
+definition of ``derivative work''.  In fact, it would be incorrect and
+problematic if the GPL attempted to define this.  A copyright license, in
+fact, has no control over what may or may not be a derivative work.  This
+matter is left up to copyright law and the courts --- not the licenses that utilize it.
 
 It is certainly true that copyright law as a whole does not propose clear
 and straightforward guidelines for what is and is not a derivative
-software work under copyright law. However, no copyright license --- not
-even the GNU GPL --- can be blamed for this. Legislators and court
+software work under copyright law.  However, no copyright license --- not
+even the GNU GPL --- can be blamed for this.  Legislators and court
 opinions must give us guidance to decide the border cases.
 
 \section{GPLv2 \S 1: Verbatim Copying}
