@@ -195,14 +195,12 @@ activities are considered non-free. The Open Source Initiative
(\defn{OSI}) (the arbiter of what is considered ``Open Source'') also regards
such licenses as inconsistent with its ``Open Source Definition''.
In general, software for which any of these freedoms are
restricted in any way is called ``nonfree'' (or as I prefer to write it, ``non-Free'') software. Some use the
term ``proprietary software'' more or less interchangeably with
``non-Free software.'' Personally, I tend to use the term ``non-Free
software'' to refer to software available noncommercially that restricts freedom
(such as ``shareware'') and ``proprietary software'' to refer to
commercial software that restricts freedom (such as nearly all of
Microsoft's and Oracle's offerings).
In general, software for which any of these freedoms are restricted in any
way is called ``nonfree'' software. Some use the term ``proprietary
software'' more or less interchangeably with ``nonfree software''. The FSF
published a useful
\href{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/categories.html}{explanation of various
types of software and how they relate to one another}.
Keep in mind that none of the terms ``software freedom'', ``open source''
and ``free software'' are known to be trademarked or otherwise legally