File diff 7d7f1ff75d7c → 20361c3263e1
compliance-guide.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -124,25 +124,25 @@ software.\footnote{This document addresses compliance with GPLv2,
 
  GPLv3, LGPLv2, and LGPLv3.  Advice on avoiding the most common
 
  errors differs little for compliance with these four licenses.
 
  \S~\ref{lgpl} discusses the key differences between GPL and LGPL
 
  compliance.}
 

	
 
\section{Evaluate License Applicability}
 
\label{derivative-works}
 
Political discussion about the GPL often centers around the ``copyleft''
 
requirements of the license.  Indeed, the license was designed primarily
 
to embody this licensing feature.  Most companies adding non-trivial
 
features (beyond mere porting and bug-fixing) to GPL'd software (and
 
thereby invoking these requirements) are already well aware of their
 
more complex obligations under the license.\footnote{While, there has been much legal
 
more complex obligations under the license.\footnote{There has been much legal
 
  discussion regarding copyleft and derivative works.  In practical
 
  reality, this issue is not relevant to the vast majority of companies
 
  distributing GPL'd software.  Those interested in this issue should study
 
  \tutorialpartsplit{\textit{Detailed Analysis of the GNU GPL and Related
 
      Licenses}'s Section on derivative works}{\S~\ref{derivative-works} of
 
    this tutorial}.}
 

	
 
However, experienced  GPL enforcers find that few redistributors'
 
compliance challenges relate directly to the copyleft provisions; this is
 
particularly true for most embedders.  Instead, the distributions of GPL'd
 
systems most often encountered typically consist of a full operating system
 
including components under the GPL (e.g., Linux, BusyBox) and components