@@ -312,7 +312,7 @@ are accurate in that they convey CC-BY-SA is a free, copyleft license.
\section{GPL and CC-BY-SA differences}
% FIXME this section ought refernece GPL portion of tutorial extensively
% FIXME this section ought refernence GPL portion of tutorial extensively
There are several differences between the GPL and CC-BY-SA that are
particularly pertinent to their analysis as copyleft licenses.
@@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ The final obvious difference pertinent to copyleft policy between
the GPL and CC-BY-SA is purpose. The GPL's preamble makes it clear
its goal is to guarantee software freedom for all users, and even
without the preamble, it is clear that this is the Free Software
Foundation''s driving goal. CC-BY-SA (and other CC licenses) state
Foundation's driving goal. CC-BY-SA (and other CC licenses) state
no purpose, and (depending on version) are preceded with a disclaimer
and neutral ``considerations for'' licensors and licensees to
think about (the CC0 public domain dedication is somewhat of an
@@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ final decisions.
% FIXME arguably this section ought be the substance of the tutorial, but is very thin and weak now
% FIXME formatted/section-referenced copy of license should be added to license-texts.tex
% and referenced througout
% and referenced throughout
The best course of action at this juncture would be to read
\url{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode} -- the entire
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ The following walk-through will simply call out portions of each
section one may wish to study especially closely due to their
pertinence to copyleft policy issues mentioned above.
% FIXME subsections might not be the right strcuture or formatting here
% FIXME subsections might not be the right structure or formatting here
\subsection{1 -- Definitions}