Changeset - f3585ce68db1
Parent rev.
Child rev.
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Tony Sebro (keynote2k) - 10 years ago 2014-03-19 16:35:09
tony@sfconservancy.org
updated analysis.
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
gpl-lgpl.tex
1
1
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
➞
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -1414,5 +1414,5 @@ First Circuit's analysis in Lotus) and a ``functional requirement for
 
compatability'' (using Sega v. Accolade, 977 F.2d 1510 (9th Cir. 1992) and
 
Sony Computer Ent. v. Connectix, 203 F.3d 596 (9th Cir. 2000) as analogies),
 
and thus unprotectable subject matter under \S 102(b).
 
and thus unprotectable subject matter under \S 102(b).
 

			




	
	
	
		
 
Perhaps not surprisingly, there have been few other cases involving a highly


			




        

    



    


    



    



      

      





    
    0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
    





    


  

  







    


    

  


    








    
        Server instance: kapok.sfconservancy.org-1868
    
    
        This site is powered by
            Kallithea 0.6.3,
        which is
        © 2010–2020 by various authors & licensed under GPLv3.
            – Support
        – Privacy Policy