Changeset - ec363feb971b
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
donaldr3 - 10 years ago 2014-03-21 20:00:52
donald@copyrighteous.office.fsf.org
removed extraneous clause
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 2 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -971,26 +971,25 @@ Section~\ref{GPLv3s14}.
 

	
 
Obviously most GPL advocates would prefer widespread migration to GPLv3, and
 
many newly formed projects who seek a copyleft license tend to choose a
 
GPLv3-based license.  However, many existing copylefted projects continue
 
with GPLv2-only or GPLv2-or-later as their default license.
 

	
 
While GPLv3 introduces many improvements --- many of which were designed to
 
increase adoption by for-profit companies --- GPLv2 remains a widely used and
 
extremely popular license.  The GPLv2 is, no doubt, a good and useful
 
license.
 

	
 
However, unlike GPLv1 before it,
 
GPLv2 remains a integral part of the copyleft licensing infrastructure for
 
some time to come.  As such, those who seek to have expertise in current
 
GPLv2 remains a integral part of the copyleft licensing infrastructure.  As such, those who seek to have expertise in current
 
topics of copyleft licensing need to study both the GPLv2 and GPLv3 family of
 
licenses.
 

	
 
Furthermore, GPLv3 can is more easily understood by first studying GPLv2.
 
This is not only because of their chronological order, but also because much
 
of the discussion material available for GPLv3 tends to talk about GPLv3 in
 
contrast to GPLv2.  As such, a strong understanding of GPLv2 helps in
 
understanding most of the third-party material found regarding GPLv3.  Thus,
 
the following chapter begins a deep discussion of GPLv2.
 

	
 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
\chapter{Running Software and Verbatim Copying}
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)