Changeset - ec363feb971b
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
donaldr3 - 10 years ago 2014-03-21 20:00:52
donald@copyrighteous.office.fsf.org
removed extraneous clause
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 2 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -959,50 +959,49 @@ second thought.
 
However, note that FSF gives herein the control of copyright holders to
 
decide whether or not to implicitly trust the FSF in its work of drafting
 
future GPL versions.  The FSF, for its part, does encourage copyright holders
 
to chose by default ``GPLv$X$-or-later'' (where $X$ is the most recent
 
version of the GPL published by the FSF).  However, the FSF \textbf{does not
 
  mandate} that a choice to use any GPL requires a copyright holder ceding
 
its authority for future licensing decisions to the FSF.  In fact, the FSF
 
considered this possibility for GPLv3 and chose not to do so, instead opting
 
for the third-party steward designation clause discussed in
 
Section~\ref{GPLv3s14}.
 

	
 
\section{Complexities of Two Simultaneously Popular Copylefts}
 

	
 
Obviously most GPL advocates would prefer widespread migration to GPLv3, and
 
many newly formed projects who seek a copyleft license tend to choose a
 
GPLv3-based license.  However, many existing copylefted projects continue
 
with GPLv2-only or GPLv2-or-later as their default license.
 

	
 
While GPLv3 introduces many improvements --- many of which were designed to
 
increase adoption by for-profit companies --- GPLv2 remains a widely used and
 
extremely popular license.  The GPLv2 is, no doubt, a good and useful
 
license.
 

	
 
However, unlike GPLv1 before it,
 
GPLv2 remains a integral part of the copyleft licensing infrastructure for
 
some time to come.  As such, those who seek to have expertise in current
 
GPLv2 remains a integral part of the copyleft licensing infrastructure.  As such, those who seek to have expertise in current
 
topics of copyleft licensing need to study both the GPLv2 and GPLv3 family of
 
licenses.
 

	
 
Furthermore, GPLv3 can is more easily understood by first studying GPLv2.
 
This is not only because of their chronological order, but also because much
 
of the discussion material available for GPLv3 tends to talk about GPLv3 in
 
contrast to GPLv2.  As such, a strong understanding of GPLv2 helps in
 
understanding most of the third-party material found regarding GPLv3.  Thus,
 
the following chapter begins a deep discussion of GPLv2.
 

	
 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
\chapter{Running Software and Verbatim Copying}
 
\label{run-and-verbatim}
 

	
 

	
 
This chapter begins the deep discussion of the details of the terms of
 
GPLv2\@. In this chapter, we consider the first two sections: GPLv2 \S\S
 
0--2. These are the straightforward sections of the GPL that define the
 
simplest rights that the user receives.
 

	
 
\section{GPLv2~\S0: Freedom to Run}
 
\label{GPLv2s0}
 

	
 
GPLv2~\S0, the opening section of GPLv2, sets forth that the copyright law governs
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)