Changeset - dab88657a43a
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Richard Fontana - 9 years ago 2014-12-21 01:04:56
fontana@sharpeleven.org
"GNU project" -> "GNU Project".
1 file changed with 3 insertions and 3 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -129,25 +129,25 @@ to have learned the following:
 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
% END OF ABSTRACTS SECTION
 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
% START OF DAY ONE COURSE
 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 

	
 
\chapter{What Is Software Freedom?}
 

	
 
Study of the GNU General Public License (herein, abbreviated as \defn{GNU
 
  GPL} or just \defn{GPL}) must begin by first considering the broader world
 
of software freedom. The GPL was not created in a vacuum. Rather, it was
 
created to embody and defend a set of principles that were set forth at the
 
founding of the GNU project and the Free Software Foundation (FSF) -- the
 
founding of the GNU Project and the Free Software Foundation (FSF) -- the
 
preeminent organization that upholds, defends and promotes the philosophy of software
 
freedom. A prerequisite for understanding both of the popular versions
 
of the GPL
 
(GPLv2 and GPLv3) and their terms and conditions is a basic understanding of
 
the principles behind them.  The GPL family of licenses are unlike nearly all
 
other software licenses in that they are designed to defend and uphold these
 
principles.
 

	
 
\section{The Free Software Definition}
 
\label{Free Software Definition}
 

	
 
The Free Software Definition is set forth in full on FSF's website at
...
 
@@ -822,27 +822,27 @@ The earliest license to grant software freedom was likely the Berkeley
 
Software Distribution (``BSD'') license.  This license is typical of what are
 
often called lax, highly permissive licenses.  Not unlike software in the
 
public domain, these non-copyleft licenses (usually) grant software freedom
 
to users, but they do not go to any effort to uphold that software freedom
 
for users.  The so-called ``downstream'' (those who receive the software and
 
then build new things based on that software) can restrict the software and
 
distribute further.
 

	
 
The GNU's Not Unix (``GNU'') project, which Richard M.~Stallman (``RMS'')
 
founded in 1984 to make a complete Unix-compatible operating system
 
implementation that assured software freedom for all.  However, RMS saw that
 
using a license that gave but did not assure software freedom would be
 
counter to the goals of the GNU project.  RMS invented ``copyleft'' as an
 
counter to the goals of the GNU Project.  RMS invented ``copyleft'' as an
 
answer to that problem, and began using various copyleft licenses for the
 
early GNU project programs.\footnote{RMS writes more fully about this topic in
 
early GNU Project programs.\footnote{RMS writes more fully about this topic in
 
  his essay entitled simply
 
  \href{http://www.gnu.org/gnu/thegnuproject.html}{\textit{The GNU Project}}.
 
    For those who want to hear the story in his own voice,
 
    \href{http://audio-video.gnu.org/audio/}{speech recordings} of his talk,
 
    \textit{The Free Software Movement and the GNU/Linux Operating System}
 
    are also widely available}
 

	
 
\section{Proto-GPLs And Their Impact}
 

	
 
%FIXME-LATER: bad line break:
 
%\href{http://www.free-soft.org/gpl_history/emacs_gpl.html}{The Emacs
 
%  General Public License}
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)