Changeset - c6183da7fd5e
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
donaldr3 - 10 years ago 2014-03-21 21:48:04
donald@copyrighteous.office.fsf.org
restructured sentence
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -2452,13 +2452,13 @@ of the GPL by dynamically linking a subprogram component to the original
 
version of a program.  The example also clarifies that the shared libraries
 
and dynamically linked subprograms that are included in Corresponding Source
 
are those that the work is ``specifically'' designed to require, which
 
clarifies that they do not include libraries invoked by the work that can be
 
readily substituted by other existing implementations.  While copyleft
 
advocates never doubted this was required under GPLv2's definition of CCS,
 
making it abundantly clear with an extra example.
 
GPLv3 makes it abundantly clear with an extra example.
 

	
 
GPL, as always, seeks to ensure users are truly in a position to install and
 
run their modified versions of the program; the CCS definition is designed to
 
be expansive to ensure this software freedom.  However, although the
 
definition of CCS is expansive, it is not sufficient to protect users'
 
freedoms in many circumstances.  For example, a GPL'd program, or a modified
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)