Changeset - c556c37c103a
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley M. Kuhn - 21 years ago 2003-05-29 23:44:11
bkuhn@fsf.org
* As submitted to OSCON 2003
1 file changed with 21 insertions and 20 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
GPL-Business/gpl-business.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -136,5 +136,5 @@ designed to defend and uphold these principles.
 
The Free Software Definition is set forth in full on FSF's website at
 
\href{http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html}{http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-sw.html}.
 
This section presents an abbreviated version that will focus on the parts
 
that are most pertinent to the terms of the GPL\@.
 
\verb0http://www.fsf.org/0 \verb0philosophy/free-sw.html0.  This section
 
presents an abbreviated version that will focus on the parts that are most
 
pertinent to the terms of the GPL\@.
 

	
...
 
@@ -167,4 +167,3 @@ Software Movement and the Open Source Movement are documented on FSF's
 
website at
 
\href{http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html}
 
{http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html}.},
 
{\tt http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/free-software-for-freedom.html}},
 
those who call the software ``Open Source'' are focused on a side issue.
...
 
@@ -238,3 +237,3 @@ to commission software modification.
 
Users may share Free Software in a variety of ways.  Free Software
 
advocates work to eliminate fundamental ethical dilemma of the software
 
advocates work to eliminate a fundamental ethical dilemma of the software
 
age: choosing between obeying a software license, and friendship (by
...
 
@@ -319,3 +318,3 @@ law\footnote{This statement is a bit of an oversimplification.  Patents
 
  mechanism for software is copyright.}.  Copyright law, with respect to
 
software governs copying, modifying, and redistributing that
 
software, governs copying, modifying, and redistributing that
 
software\footnote{Copyright law in general also governs ``public
...
 
@@ -370,3 +369,3 @@ Carefully note that software in the public domain is \emph{not} licensed
 
in any way.  It is nonsensical to say software is ``licensed for the
 
public domain'', or any phrase that implies the copyright holder gave an
 
public domain'', or any phrase that implies the copyright holder gave
 
expressed permission to take actions governed by copyright law.
...
 
@@ -411,3 +410,3 @@ extend'' cycle, FSF made a conscious choice to copyright its Free Software,
 
and then license it under ``copyleft'' terms, and many, including the
 
developers of the kernel named Linux have chosen to follow this paradigm.
 
developers of the kernel named Linux, have chosen to follow this paradigm.
 

	
...
 
@@ -472,6 +471,6 @@ as well, and their system administrators began to use it in place of
 
Microsoft Windows NT file-servers.  This served to lower the cost of
 
ownership by orders of magnitude.  There was suddenly room in Windows
 
file-server budgets to hire contractors to improve Samba.  Some of the first
 
people hired to do such work were those same two graduate students who
 
originally developed the software.
 
running such servers by orders of magnitude.  There was suddenly room in
 
Windows file-server budgets to hire contractors to improve Samba.  Some of
 
the first people hired to do such work were those same two graduate
 
students who originally developed the software.
 

	
...
 
@@ -593,2 +592,3 @@ how software freedom is respected.
 
\section{GPL \S 0: Freedom to Run}
 
\label{GPLs0}
 

	
...
 
@@ -623,3 +623,3 @@ nor determined by a court to be covered, but are common and enjoyed by
 
many users.  An example of unregulated use is reading a printout of the
 
programs source code like an instruction book for the purpose of learning
 
program's source code like an instruction book for the purpose of learning
 
how to be a better programmer.
...
 
@@ -646,3 +646,3 @@ The GPL is often mistakenly criticized because it fails to give a
 
definition of ``derivative work''.  In fact, it would be incorrect and
 
problematic if the GPL attempt to define this.  A copyright license, in
 
problematic if the GPL attempted to define this.  A copyright license, in
 
fact, has no control over what may or may not be a derivative work.  This
...
 
@@ -657,2 +657,3 @@ opinions must give us guidance to decide the border cases.
 
\section{GPL \S 1: Verbatim Copying}
 
\label{GPLs1}
 

	
...
 
@@ -707,3 +708,3 @@ continues and develops, remains Free as in freedom.
 
To achieve that goal, \S 2 first sets forth that the rights of
 
redistribution modified versions are the same as those for verbatim
 
redistribution of modified versions are the same as those for verbatim
 
copying, as presented in \S 1.  Therefore, the details of charging,
...
 
@@ -720,6 +721,6 @@ the standard version of program, because while there are many advantages
 
to using a fork, there are a few disadvantages.  Users should be informed
 
the historical context of the software version they use, so that they can
 
make proper support choices.  Finally, \S 2(a) serves an academic purpose
 
--- ensuring that future developers can use a diachronic approach to
 
understand the software.
 
about the historical context of the software version they use, so that
 
they can make proper support choices.  Finally, \S 2(a) serves an academic
 
purpose --- ensuring that future developers can use a diachronic approach
 
to understand the software.
 

	
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)