Changeset - b0801a2b8a2f
[Not reviewed]
0 3 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 9 years ago 2014-12-20 00:09:01
bkuhn@ebb.org
Clarify sentence.

Make this sentence a bit clearer.
3 files changed with 3 insertions and 3 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
compliance-guide.tex
Show inline comments
 
% compliance-guide.tex                            -*- LaTeX -*-
 

	
 
\part{A Practical Guide to GPL Compliance}
 
\label{gpl-compliance-guide}
 

	
 
{\parindent 0in
 
This part is: \\
 
\begin{tabbing}
 
Copyright \= \copyright{} 2008, 2014 \= \hspace{.2in} Bradley M. Kuhn. \\
 
Copyright \= \copyright{} 2014 \> \hspace{.2in} Free Software Foundation, Inc. \\
 
Copyright \> \copyright{} 2008, 2014 \> \hspace{.2in} Software Freedom Law Center. \\
 
\end{tabbing}
 

	
 
\vspace{.1in}
 

	
 
\begin{center}
 
The copyright holders of this part hereby grant the freedom to copy, modify,
 
convey, Adapt, and/or redistribute this work under the terms of the Creative
 
Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International License.  A copy of that
 
license is available at
 
\url{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode}.
 

	
 
\vfill
 

	
 
This part includes material from many sources, including the following
 
This part includes material from many sources, including some material from the following
 
CC-By-SA-licensed published works: \\
 

	
 
\begin{itemize}
 
\item \hrefnofollow{http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/compliance-guide.html}{\textit{The Practical Guide GPL Compliance}}, by Bradley M. Kuhn, Aaron
 
Williamson and Karen Sandler, first published on 2008-08-20. \\
 
\item \hrefnofollow{http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2014/SFLC-Guide_to_GPL_Compliance_2d_ed.html}{\textit{Software Freedom Law Center Guide to GPL Compliance, 2nd
 
  Edition}} by Eben Moglen and Mishi Choudhary, first published on 2014-10-31. \\
 
\end{itemize}
 

	
 
However, this work is primarily composed of the many contributions it
 
receives as a public, collaborative project.  Please
 
\href{https://gitorious.org/copyleft-org/tutorial/history/master:compliance-guide.tex}{review
 
  its Git logs} for full documentation of all contributions.
 

	
 
\end{center}
 
}
 

	
 
\pagebreak
 

	
 
\chapter*{Executive Summary}
 

	
 
This is a guide to effective compliance with the GNU General Public
 
License (GPL) and related licenses.  Copyleft advocates
 
usually seek to assist the community with
 
GPL compliance cooperatively.   This guide focuses on complying from the
 
start, so that readers can learn to avoid enforcement actions entirely, or, at
 
least, minimize  the negative impact when enforcement actions occur.
 
This guide  introduces and explains basic legal concepts related to the GPL and its
 
enforcement by copyright holders. It also outlines business practices and
 
methods that lead to better GPL compliance.  Finally, it recommends proper
 
post-violation responses to the concerns of copyright holders.
 

	
 
\chapter{Background}
 

	
 
Copyright law grants exclusive rights to authors.  Authors who chose copyleft
 
seek to protect the freedom of users and developers to copy, share, modify
 
and redistribute the software.  However, copyleft is ultimately implemented
 
through copyright, and the GPL is primarily and by default a copyright
 
license.  (See \S~\ref{explaining-copyright} for more about the interaction
 
between copyright and copyleft.)  Copyright law grants an unnatural exclusive
 
control to copyright holders regarding copyright-controlled permissions
 
related to the work.  Therefore, copyright holders (or their agents) are the
 
ultimately the sole authorities to enforce copyleft and protect the rights of
 
users.  Actions for copyright infringement are the ultimate legal mechanism
 
for enforcement.  Therefore, copyright holders, or collaborative groups of
 
copyright holders, have historically been the actors in GPL enforcement.
 

	
 
The earliest of these efforts began soon after the GPL was written by
enforcement-case-studies.tex
Show inline comments
 
%      Tutorial Text for the Detailed Study and Analysis of GPL and LGPL course
 

	
 
% License: CC-By-SA-4.0
 

	
 
% The copyright holders hereby grant the freedom to copy, modify, convey,
 
% Adapt, and/or redistribute this work under the terms of the Creative
 
% Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International License.
 

	
 
% This text is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
 
% WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 
% MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
 

	
 
% You should have received a copy of the license with this document in
 
% a file called 'CC-By-SA-4.0.txt'.  If not, please visit
 
% https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode to receive
 
% the license text.
 

	
 

	
 
\part{Case Studies in GPL Enforcement}
 

	
 
{\parindent 0in
 
This part is: \\
 
\begin{tabbing}
 
Copyright \= \copyright{} 2003, 2004, 2014 \hspace{1mm} \= \hspace{1.mm} \=  \kill
 
Copyright \> \copyright{} 2014 \>  Bradley M. Kuhn. \\
 
Copyright \> \copyright{} 2014 \>  Denver Gingerich \\
 
Copyright \> \copyright{} 2003, 2004, 2014 \> Free Software Foundation, Inc. \\
 
\end{tabbing}
 

	
 
\vspace{.2in}
 

	
 
\begin{center}
 

	
 
The copyright holders hereby grant the freedom to copy, modify, convey,
 
Adapt, and/or redistribute this work under the terms of the Creative Commons
 
Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International License.  A copy of that license is
 
available at \url{https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode}.
 
\end{center}
 

	
 
\vfill
 

	
 
This part includes material from many sources, including the following
 
This part includes material from many sources, including some material from the following
 
CC-By-SA-licensed published works: \\
 

	
 
\begin{itemize}
 
\item \textit{Enforcement Case Studies}, written by Bradley M. Kuhn and published by the Free
 
  Software Foundation for its CLE courses  on 2004-01-20, 2004-08-24, and 2014-03-24.
 
\end{itemize}
 

	
 
However, this work is primarily composed of the many contributions it
 
receives as a public, collaborative project.  Please
 
\href{https://gitorious.org/copyleft-org/tutorial/history/master:enforcement-case-studies.tex}{review
 
  its Git logs} for full documentation of all contributions.
 

	
 

	
 
}
 
% =====================================================================
 
% START OF SECOND DAY SEMINAR SECTION
 
% =====================================================================
 

	
 
\chapter*{Preface}
 

	
 
This one-day course presents the details of five different GPL
 
compliance cases handled by FSF's GPL Compliance Laboratory. Each case
 
offers unique insights into problems that can arise when the terms of
 
the GPL are not properly followed, and how diplomatic negotiation between
 
the violator and the copyright holder can yield positive results for
 
both parties.
 

	
 
Attendees should have successfully completely the course, a ``Detailed
 
Study and Analysis of the GPL and LGPL,'' as the material from that
 
course forms the building blocks for this material.
 

	
 
This course is of most interest to lawyers who have clients or
 
employers that deal with Free Software on a regular basis. However,
 
technical managers and executives whose businesses use or distribute
 
Free Software will also find the course very helpful.
 

	
 
\bigskip
 

	
 
These course materials are merely a summary of the highlights of the
 
course presented. Please be aware that during the actual GPL course, class
 
discussion supplements this printed curriculum. Simply reading it is
 
not equivalent to attending the course.
 

	
 
%FIXME-LATER: write these
 

	
 
%\chapter{Not All GPL Enforcement is Created Equal}
 

	
 
%\section{For-Profit Enforcement}
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -7,97 +7,97 @@
 
% The copyright holders hereby grant the freedom to copy, modify, convey,
 
% Adapt, and/or redistribute this work under the terms of the Creative
 
% Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International License.
 

	
 
% This text is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
 
% WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
 
% MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
 

	
 
% You should have received a copy of the license with this document in
 
% a file called 'CC-By-SA-4.0.txt'.  If not, please visit
 
% https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode to receive
 
% the license text.
 

	
 
% FIXME-LATER: I should make a macro like the Texinfo @xref stuff for places
 
%      where I'm saying ``see section X in this tutorial'', so that the extra
 
%      verbiage isn't there in the HTML versions that I'll eventually do.
 
%      Maybe something like that already exists?  In the worst case, I could
 
%      adapt @xref from texinfo.texi for it.
 

	
 
\newcommand{\defn}[1]{\emph{#1}}
 

	
 
\part{Detailed Analysis of the GNU GPL and Related Licenses}
 
\label{gpl-lgpl-part}
 

	
 
{\parindent 0in
 
\tutorialpartsplit{``Detailed Analysis of the GNU GPL and Related Licenses''}{This part} is: \\
 
\begin{tabbing}
 
Copyright \= \copyright{} 2003--2007, 2014 \hspace{.1mm} \=  \kill
 
Copyright \> \copyright{} 2014 \> Bradley M. Kuhn \\
 
Copyright \> \copyright{} 2014 \>  Anthony K. Sebro, Jr. \\
 
Copyright \> \copyright{} 2003--2007, 2014 \>  Free Software Foundation, Inc. \\
 
Copyright \> \copyright{} 2014 \>  Software Freedom Law Center.
 
\end{tabbing}
 

	
 

	
 
\vspace{.2in}
 

	
 
\begin{center}
 

	
 
The copyright holders of \tutorialpartsplit{``Detailed Analysis of the GNU GPL and Related Licenses''}{this part} hereby grant the freedom to copy, modify,
 
convey, Adapt, and/or redistribute this work under the terms of the Creative
 
Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International License.  A copy of that
 
license is available at
 
\verb=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/legalcode=.
 
\end{center}
 

	
 
\vfill
 

	
 
This part includes material from many sources, including the following
 
This part includes material from many sources, including some material from the following
 
CC-By-SA-licensed published works: \\
 

	
 
\begin{itemize}
 
\item \textit{Detailed Analysis of the GNU GPL and Related Licenses}, written by
 
Bradley M. Kuhn, Daniel B.~Ravicher, and John Sullivan and published by the Free Software Foundation for its CLE courses on 2004-01-20,
 
2004-08-24, and 2014-03-24.
 
\item \hrefnofollow{http://gplv3.fsf.org/gpl-rationale-2006-01-16.html}{\textit{GPLv3 First Discussion Draft Rationale}}, written and published by the Free
 
  Software Foundation on 2006-01-16.
 
\item \hrefnofollow{http://gplv3.fsf.org/opinions-draft-2.html}{\textit{GPLv3 Second Discussion Draft Rationale}}, written and published by the Free
 
  Software Foundation circa 2006-07.
 
\item \hrefnofollow{http://gplv3.fsf.org/gpl3-dd3-guide}{\textit{GPLv3 Third Discussion Draft Rationale}}, written and published by the Free
 
  Software Foundation on   2007-03-28.
 
\item \hrefnofollow{http://gplv3.fsf.org/dd3-faq}{\textit{GPLv3  Discussion Draft 3 FAQ}}, written and published by the Free1 Software Foundation on   2007-03-28.
 
\item \hrefnofollow{http://gplv3.fsf.org/gpl3-dd4-guide.html}{\textit{GPLv3 Final Discussion Draft Rationale}} written and published by the Free
 
  Software Foundation onon 2007-05-31.
 
\item \hrefnofollow{http://www.gnu.org/licences/gpl3-final-rationale.pdf}{\textit{GPLv3 Final Rationale}}, written and published by the Free
 
  Software Foundation on 2007-06-29.
 
  
 
\end{itemize}
 

	
 
However, this work is primarily composed of the many contributions it
 
receives as a public, collaborative project.  Please
 
\href{https://gitorious.org/copyleft-org/tutorial/history/master:gpl-lgpl.tex}{review
 
  its Git logs} for full documentation of all contributions.
 
}
 
\pagebreak
 

	
 
\tutorialpartsplit{This tutorial}{This part of the tutorial} gives a
 
comprehensive explanation of the most popular Free Software copyright
 
license, the GNU General Public License (``GNU GPL'', or sometimes just
 
``GPL'') -- both version 2 (``GPLv2'') and version 3 (``GPLv3'') -- and
 
teaches lawyers, software developers, managers and business people how to use
 
the GPL (and GPL'd software) successfully both as a community-building
 
``Constitution'' for a software project, and to incorporate copylefted
 
software into a new Free Software business and in existing, successful
 
enterprises.
 

	
 
To benefit from this part of the tutorial, readers should
 
have a general familiarity with software development processes.  A basic
 
understanding of how copyright law applies to software is also helpful.  The
 
tutorial is of most interest to lawyers, software developers and managers who
 
run or advise software businesses that modify and/or redistribute software
 
under the terms of the GNU GPL (or who wish to do so in the future), and those
 
who wish to make use of existing GPL'd software in their enterprise.
 

	
 
Upon completion of this part of the tutorial, readers can expect
 
to have learned the following:
 

	
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)