Copyleft/guide Changeset - af63358d308c

Changeset - af63358d308c

Parent rev.

Child rev.

[Not reviewed]

0 1 0

Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-19 17:39:22
bkuhn@ebb.org

Minor typo and formatting fixes.

1 file changed with 3 insertions and 3 deletions:

gpl-lgpl.tex

0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)

gpl-lgpl.tex

➞

Show inline comments

@@ ... / @@ -385,5 +385,5 @@ of the software into a file. @@
 Imagine if authors could truly disclaim those default control of copyright
 law.  If so, the software is in the public domain -- no longer covered by
+law.  If so, the software is in the public domain --- no longer covered by
 copyright.  Since copyright law is the construction allowing for most
 restrictions on software (i.e., prohibition of copying, modification, and
@@ ... / @@ -392,5 +392,5 @@ yields software freedom for its users. @@
 Carefully note that software truly in the public domain is \emph{not} licensed
 in any way. It is confusing to say software is ``licensed for the
+in any way.  It is confusing to say software is ``licensed for the
 public domain,'' or any phrase that implies the copyright holder gave
 express permission to take actions governed by copyright law.
@@ ... @@
 example.
 Because copyright controls are usually automatically granted and because, in
-some jurisdictions, some copyright controls cannot be waived (See
+some jurisdictions, some copyright controls cannot be waived (see
 Section~\ref{non-usa-copyright} for further discussion), many copyright
 holders sometimes incorrectly believe a work has been placed in the public

0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)