Changeset - 9b7159eeed2c
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-21 01:33:22
bkuhn@ebb.org
Cut footnote.
1 file changed with 2 insertions and 19 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
compliance-guide.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -283,67 +283,50 @@ generating a final firmware image suitable for distribution to the
 
customer.  Require developers to use revision control for build processes.
 
Make a rule that adding new components to the system without adequate
 
build instructions (or better yet, scripts) is unacceptable engineering
 
practice.
 

	
 
\chapter{Details of Compliant Distribution}
 

	
 
This section explains the specific requirements placed upon
 
distributors of GPL'd software.  Note that this section refers heavily to
 
specific provisions and language in
 
\href{http://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html#section3}{GPLv2}
 
and \href{http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl.html#section6}{GPLv3}.
 
It may be helpful to have a copy of each license open while reading this
 
section.
 

	
 
\section{Binary Distribution Permission}
 
\label{binary-distribution-permission}
 

	
 
% be careful below, you cannot refill the \if section, so don't refill
 
% this paragraph without care.
 

	
 
The various versions of the GPL are copyright licenses that grant
 
permission to make certain uses of software that are otherwise restricted
 
by copyright law.  This permission is conditioned upon compliance with the
 
GPL's requirements.\footnote{For a full discussion of this concept, please see
 
\ifpdf
 
\href{http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html\#x1-40002}{the
 
  chapter entitled ``Common Copyright Questions''} in SFLC's publication,
 
\href{http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.pdf}{\textit{A
 
    Legal Issues Primer for Open Source and Free Software Projects}}.
 
\else
 
\ifx \generateHTML \isGeneratingHTML
 
\href{http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html\#x1-40002}{the
 
  chapter entitled ``Common Copyright Questions''} in SFLC's publication
 
\href{http://www.softwarefreedom.org/resources/2008/foss-primer.html}{\textit{A
 
    Legal Issues Primer for Open Source and Free Software Projects}}.
 
\else
 
the chapter entitled ``Common Copyright Questions'' in SFLC's publication,
 
\textit{A Legal Issues Primer for Open Source and Free Software
 
  Projects}.
 
\fi
 
\fi
 
}
 
GPL's requirements.
 

	
 
This section walks through the requirements (of both GPLv2 and GPLv3) that
 
apply when you distribute GPL'd programs in binary (i.e., executable or
 
object code) form, which is typical for embedded applications.  Because a
 
binary application derives from a program's original sources, you need
 
permission from the copyright holder to distribute it.  \S~3 of GPLv2 and
 
\S~6 of GPLv3 contain the permissions and conditions related to binary
 
distributions of GPL'd programs.\footnote{These sections cannot be fully
 
  understood in isolation; read the entire license thoroughly before
 
  focusing on any particular provision.  However, once you have read and
 
  understood the entire license, look to these sections to guide
 
  compliance for binary distributions.}
 

	
 
GPL's binary distribution sections offer a choice of compliance methods,
 
each of which we consider in turn.  Each option refers to the
 
``Corresponding Source'' code for the binary distribution, which includes
 
the source code from which the binary was produced.  This abbreviated and
 
simplified definition is sufficient for the binary distribution discussion
 
in this section, but you may wish to refer back to this section after
 
reading the thorough discussion of ``Corresponding Source'' that appears
 
in \S~\ref{corresponding-source}.
 

	
 
\subsection{Option (a): Source Alongside Binary}
 

	
 
GPLv2~\S~3(a) and v3~\S~6(a) embody the easiest option for providing
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)