Changeset - 90f1aab65675
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-15 22:45:11
bkuhn@ebb.org
Two spaces everywhere.
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -659,49 +659,49 @@ the earlier.
 

	
 
We could imagine a legal practice that was different --- briefs and
 
arguments that were kept secret; rulings that announced a result but not
 
the reasoning. Laws that were kept by the police but published to no one
 
else. Regulation that operated without explaining its rule.
 

	
 
We could imagine this society, but we could not imagine calling it
 
``free.''  Whether or not the incentives in such a society would be better
 
or more efficiently allocated, such a society could not be known as free.
 
The ideals of freedom, of life within a free society, demand more than
 
efficient application.  Instead, openness and transparency are the
 
constraints within which a legal system gets built, not options to be
 
added if convenient to the leaders.  Life governed by software code should
 
be no less.
 

	
 
Code writing is not litigation.  It is better, richer, more
 
productive.  But the law is an obvious instance of how creativity and
 
incentives do not depend upon perfect control over the products
 
created.  Like jazz, or novels, or architecture, the law gets built
 
upon the work that went before. This adding and changing is what
 
creativity always is.  And a free society is one that assures that its
 
most important resources remain free in just this sense.\footnote{This
 
quotation is Copyright \copyright{} 2002, Lawrence Lessig. It is
 
licensed under the terms of
 
\texttt{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/}{the ``Attribution
 
\href{http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/}{the ``Attribution
 
License'' version 1.0} or any later version as published by Creative
 
Commons.}
 
\end{quotation}
 

	
 
In essence, lawyers are paid to service the shared commons of legal
 
infrastructure.  Few citizens defend themselves in court or write their
 
own briefs (even though they are legally permitted to do so) because
 
everyone would prefer to have an expert do that job.
 

	
 
The Free Software economy is a market ripe for experts.  It
 
functions similarly to other well established professional fields like the
 
law. The GPL, in turn, serves as the legal scaffolding that permits the
 
creation of this vibrant commercial and noncommercial Free Software
 
economy.
 

	
 
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
\chapter{A Tale of Two Copyleft Licenses}
 

	
 
\section{Historical Motivations for the General Public License}
 

	
 
\section{Proto-GPLs And Their Impact}
 

	
 
\section{The GNU General Public License, Version 1}
 

	
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)