Changeset - 70772b5f7168
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-19 17:12:50
bkuhn@ebb.org
There are many other countries that are the "United States".
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_%28disambiguation%29

As such, use "USA" to refer to the United States of America.

Obviously, it's not the only united states in America, but USA is at least
the official internationally recognized name.
1 file changed with 10 insertions and 10 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -350,3 +350,3 @@ software secret.
 

	
 
Copyright is not a natural state, it is a legal construction. In the US, the
 
Copyright is not a natural state, it is a legal construction. In the USA, the
 
Constitution permits, but does not require, the creation of copyright law as
...
 
@@ -371,3 +371,3 @@ covered by that legal system.  However, it is possible to move software out
 
of the domain of the copyright system.  A copyright holder can often
 
\defn{disclaim} their copyright (for example, under US copyright law
 
\defn{disclaim} their copyright (for example, under USA copyright law
 
it is possible for a copyright holder to engage in conduct resulting
...
 
@@ -2251,3 +2251,3 @@ Notices''.
 
Although the definition of ``work based on the Program'' made use of a legal
 
term of art, ``derivative work,'' peculiar to US copyright law, we did not
 
term of art, ``derivative work,'' peculiar to USA copyright law, we did not
 
believe that this presented difficulties as significant as those associated
...
 
@@ -2256,3 +2256,3 @@ concepts corresponding to the derivative work are recognized in all copyright
 
law systems.  That these counterpart concepts might differ to some degree in
 
scope and breadth from the US derivative work was simply a consequence of
 
scope and breadth from the USA derivative work was simply a consequence of
 
varying national treatment of the right of altering a copyrighted work.
...
 
@@ -2262,4 +2262,4 @@ varying national treatment of the right of altering a copyrighted work.
 
Ironically, the criticism we have received regarding the use of
 
US-specific legal terminology in the ``work based on the Program''
 
definition has come not primarily from readers outside the US, but
 
USA-specific legal terminology in the ``work based on the Program''
 
definition has come not primarily from readers outside the USA, but
 
from those within it, and particularly from members of the technology
...
 
@@ -2267,3 +2267,3 @@ licensing bar.  They have argued that the definition of ``work based
 
on the Program'' effectively misstates what a derivative work is under
 
US law, and they have contended that it attempts, by indirect means,
 
USA law, and they have contended that it attempts, by indirect means,
 
to extend the scope of copyleft in ways they consider undesirable.
...
 
@@ -2271,3 +2271,3 @@ They have also asserted that it confounds the concepts of derivative
 
and collective works, two terms of art that they assume, questionably,
 
to be neatly disjoint under US law.
 
to be neatly disjoint under USA law.
 

	
...
 
@@ -2341,3 +2341,3 @@ copies within an organization.  In many countries the term ``making available
 
to the public'' or ``communicating to the public'' is the closest counterpart
 
to the generalized notion of distribution that exists under US law.
 
to the generalized notion of distribution that exists under USA law.
 

	
...
 
@@ -2366,3 +2366,3 @@ transfers of copies of software in behavioral rather than statutory terms.
 
At the same time, we have acknowledged the use of ``making available to the
 
public'' in jurisdictions outside the US by adding it as a specific example
 
public'' in jurisdictions outside the USA by adding it as a specific example
 
in the definition of ``propagate.'' We decided to leave the precise
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)