Changeset - 59bff741f28b
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-19 14:00:54
bkuhn@ebb.org
Small formatting fixes in this paragraph.
1 file changed with 2 insertions and 2 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -2288,14 +2288,14 @@ throughout the text of GPLv2, the definition of CCS\footnote{Note that the
 
  ``Complete Corresponding Source''.  Meanwhile, use of the acronym ``CCS''
 
  (sometimes, ``C&CS'') was so widespread among GPL enforcers that its use
 
  continues even though GPLv3-focused experts tend to say just the defined
 
  term of ``Corresponding Source''.}, or, as GPLv3 officially calls it,
 
``Corresponding Source'', is given in GPLv3~\S1\P4.  This definition is as
 
broad as necessary to protect users' exercise of their rights under the
 
GPL. We follow the definition with particular examples to remove any doubt
 
that they are to be considered Complete Corresponding Source Code. We wish to
 
GPL\@.  We follow the definition with particular examples to remove any doubt
 
that they are to be considered Complete Corresponding Source Code.  We wish to
 
make completely clear that a licensee cannot avoid complying with the
 
requirements of the GPL by dynamically linking an add-on component to the
 
original version of a program.
 

	
 
Though the definition of Complete Corresponding Source Code in the
 
second paragraph of section 1 is expansive, it is not sufficient to
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)