Copyleft/guide Changeset - 3e638118b8fe

Changeset - 3e638118b8fe

Parent rev.

Child rev.

[Not reviewed]

0 1 0

Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-09-17 22:31:43
bkuhn@ebb.org

Rework these two paragraphs.

As previously written, these two paragraphs were saying very little with
a lot of words. I've attempted to rework it a bit.

1 file changed with 9 insertions and 4 deletions:

compliance-guide.tex

0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)

compliance-guide.tex

➞

Show inline comments

@@ ... @@
   with LGPL'd libraries. This is discussed in detail in \S~\ref{lgpl}.}
 In the latter case, where the work is unquestionably a separate work of
 creative expression, no copyleft provisions are invoked.
 The core compliance issue faced, thus, in such a situation, is not an discussion of what is or is not a
 combined or derivative work, but rather, issues related to distribution and
 conveyance of binary works based on GPL'd source, but without Complete,
 Corresponding Source.  This tutorial therefore focuses primarily on that issue.
 Admittedly, a tiny
 minority of situations lie outside these two categories, and thus
 do involve close questions about derivative and combined works.  Those
 situations admittedly do require a highly
 minority of compliance situations relate to question of derivative and
 combined words.  Those
 situations are so rare, and the details from situation to situation differ
 greatly.  Thus, such situations require a highly
 fact-dependent analysis and cannot be addressed in a general-purpose
-document, anyway.
+document such as this one.
 \medskip

0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)