Changeset - 2b98827e568e
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-20 17:20:12
bkuhn@ebb.org
Missing period, and remove FIXME that's now fixed.
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 4 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -2736,52 +2736,49 @@ services for the support of that software.
 

	
 
\section{GPLv3~\S5: Modified Source}
 
\label{GPLv3s5}
 

	
 
GPLv3\S5 is the rewrite of GPLv2\S2, which was discussed in \S~\ref{GPLv2s2}
 
of this tutorial.  This section discusses the changes found in GPLv3\S5
 
compared to GPLv2\S2.
 

	
 
GPLv3\S5(a) still requires modified versions be marked with ``relevant
 
date'', but no longer says ``the date of any change''.  The best practice is
 
to include the date of the latest and/or most significant changes and who
 
made those.  Of course, compared to its GPLv2\S2(a), GPLv3\S5(a) slightly
 
relaxes the requirements regarding notice of changes to the program.  In
 
particular, the modified files themselves need no longer be marked.  This
 
reduces administrative burdens for developers of modified versions of GPL'd
 
software.
 

	
 
GPLv3\S5(b) is a new but simple provision. GPLv3\S5(b)  requires that the
 
license text itself must be unmodified (except as permitted by GPLv3\S7; see
 
\S~\ref{GPLv3s7} in this tutorial).  Furthermore, it  removes any perceived
 
conflict between the words ``keep intact all notices'' in GPLv3\S4, since
 
operating under GPLv3\S5 still includes all the requirements of GPLv3\S4 by
 
reference.
 

	
 
% FIXME:  It's now (b) and (c).  Also, ``validity'' of proprietary
 
%         relicensing?  Give me a break.  I'll fix that.
 

	
 
GPLv3\S5(c) is the primary source-code-related copyleft provision of GPL (The
 
GPLv3\S5(c) is the primary source-code-related copyleft provision of GPL. (The
 
object-code-related copyleft provisions are in GPLv3\S6, discussed in
 
\S~\ref{GPLv3s6} of this tutorial).  Compared to GPLv2\S2(b), GPLv3\S5(c)
 
states that the GPL applies to the whole of the work.  Such was stated
 
already in GPLv2\S2(b), in ``in whole or in part'', but this simplified
 
wording makes it clear the entire covered work
 

	
 
Another change in GPLv3\S5(c) is the removal of the
 
words ``at no charge,'' which was often is misunderstood upon na\"{i}ve
 
reading of in GPLv2\S(b) (as discussed in \S~\ref{GPLv2s2-at-no-charge} of this
 
tutorial).
 

	
 
%  FIXME: 5d.  Related to Appropriatey Legal notices
 

	
 

	
 
% follows 5d now, call it the ``final paragraph''
 

	
 
The paragraph following subsection 5c has been revised for clarity, but the
 
underlying meaning is unchanged. When independent non-derivative sections are
 
distributed for use in a combination that is a covered work, the whole of the
 
combination must be licensed under the GPL, regardless of the form in which
 
such combination occurs, including combination by dynamic linking. The final
 
sentence of the paragraph adapts this requirement to the new compatibility
 
provisions of section 7.
 

	
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)