filings.   Everyone may examine their revenue models and scrutinize their

work.

However, entities and individuals who do GPL enforcement centered primarily

around a profit motive are likely the most dangerous enforcement entities for

one simple reason: an agreement to comply fully with the GPL for past and

future products --- always the paramount goal to COGEOs --- may not suffice as

adequate resolution for a proprietary relicensing company or grey hat GPL

enforcer.  Therefore, violators must consider carefully who has

made the enforcement inquiry and ask when and where the enforcer made public

commitments and reports regarding their enforcement work and perhaps even ask

the enforcer to directly mimic CEOGEO's detailed public disclosures and

  resolution} found in this document.

\chapter{Conclusion}

GPL compliance need not be an onerous process.  Historically, struggles

have been the result of poor development methodologies and communications,

rather than any unexpected application of the GPL's source code disclosure

requirements.

Compliance is straightforward when the entirety of your enterprise is

well-informed and well-coordinated.  The receptionists should know how to

route a GPL source request or accusation of infringement.  The lawyers