Changeset - 20fba8b65462
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
donaldr3 - 10 years ago 2014-03-21 21:10:46
donald@copyrighteous.office.fsf.org
removed extra 'software'
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -1891,49 +1891,49 @@ is distributed among many entities within the community for the purpose
 
of constant evolution and improvement. In this way, the law of implied
 
patent license used by the GPLv2 ensures that the community mutually
 
benefits from the licensing of patents to any single community member.
 

	
 
Note that simply because GPLv2'd software has an implied patent license does
 
not mean that any patents held by a distributor of GPLv2'd code become
 
worthless. To the contrary, the patents are still valid and enforceable
 
against either:
 

	
 
\begin{enumerate}
 
 \renewcommand{\theenumi}{\alph{enumi}}
 
 \renewcommand{\labelenumi}{\textup{(\theenumi)}}
 

	
 
\item any software other than that licensed under the GPLv2 by the patent
 
  holder, and
 

	
 
\item any party that does not comply with the GPLv2
 
with respect to the licensed software.
 
\end{enumerate}
 

	
 
\newcommand{\compB}{$\mathcal{B}$}
 
\newcommand{\compA}{$\mathcal{A}$}
 

	
 
For example, if Company \compA{} has a patent on advanced Web browsing, but
 
also licenses a Web browsing software program under the GPLv2, then it
 
also licenses a Web browsing program under the GPLv2, then it
 
cannot assert the patent against any party based on that party's use of 
 
Company \compA{}'s GPL'ed Web browsing software program, or on that party's
 
creation and use of derivative works of that GPL'ed program.  However, if a
 
party uses that program without
 
complying with the GPLv2, then Company \compA{} can assert both copyright
 
infringement claims against the non-GPLv2-compliant party and
 
infringement of the patent, because the implied patent license only
 
extends to use of the software in accordance with the GPLv2. Further, if
 
Company \compB{} distributes a competitive advanced Web browsing program 
 
that is not a derivative work of Company \compA{}'s GPL'd Web browsing software
 
program, Company \compA{} is free to assert its patent against any user or
 
distributor of that product. It is irrelevant whether Company \compB's
 
program is also distributed under the GPLv2, as Company \compB{} can not grant
 
implied licenses to Company \compA's patent.
 

	
 
This result also reassures companies that they need not fear losing their
 
proprietary value in patents to competitors through the GPLv2 implied patent
 
license, as only those competitors who adopt and comply with the GPLv2's
 
terms can benefit from the implied patent license. To continue the
 
example above, Company \compB{} does not receive a free ride on Company
 
\compA's patent, as Company \compB{} has not licensed-in and then
 
redistributed Company A's advanced Web browser under the GPLv2. If Company
 
\compB{} does do that, however, Company \compA{} still has not lost
 
competitive advantage against Company \compB{}, as Company \compB{} must then,
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)