Changeset - 10244bee1439
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-20 21:38:34
bkuhn@ebb.org
Purely formatting changes.
1 file changed with 5 insertions and 5 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -2978,4 +2978,4 @@ it is not clear whether a product falls under the definition of consumer
 
product, the product will be treated as a consumer product.\footnote{16
 
C.F.R.~\S\ 700.1(a); \textit{McFadden v.~Dryvit Systems, Inc.}, 54
 
U.C.C.~Rep.~Serv.2d 934 (D.~Ore.~2004).}  Moreover, for a given product,
 
CFR~\S\ 700.1(a); \textit{McFadden v.~Dryvit Systems, Inc.}, 54
 
UCC~Rep.~Serv.2d 934 (D.~Ore.~2004).}  Moreover, for a given product,
 
``normally used'' is understood to refer to the typical use of that type
...
 
@@ -2985,3 +2985,3 @@ purposes are consumer products, even if the person invoking rights is a
 
commercial entity intending to use the product for commercial
 
purposes.\footnote{16 C.F.R. \S \ 700.1(a).  Numerous court decisions
 
purposes.\footnote{16 CFR \S \ 700.1(a).  Numerous court decisions
 
interpreting Magnuson-Moss are in accord; see, e.g., \textit{Stroebner
...
 
@@ -2990,3 +2990,3 @@ Motors, Inc.~v.~Automobili Lamborghini S.p.A.}, 459 F.~Supp.2d 1028,
 
is enough to cause an entire product line to be treated as a consumer
 
product under Magnuson-Moss.\footnote{\textit{Tandy Corp.~v.~Marymac
 
product under Magnuson-Moss\footnote{\textit{Tandy Corp.~v.~Marymac
 
Industries, Inc.}, 213 U.S.P.Q.~702 (S.D.~Tex.~1981). In this case, the
...
 
@@ -2995,3 +2995,3 @@ such computers were designed and advertised for a variety of users,
 
including small businesses and schools, and had only recently been
 
promoted for use in the home.}
 
promoted for use in the home.}.
 

	
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)