Changeset - 0ffabed0e0e6
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Bradley Kuhn (bkuhn) - 10 years ago 2014-03-21 00:30:49
bkuhn@ebb.org
I still love to write texit.
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
gpl-lgpl.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -2935,25 +2935,25 @@ family, or household use.  Distributors are only required to provide
 
Installation Information when they convey object code in a User Product.
 

	
 
In brief, the right to convey object code in a defined class of ``User
 
Products,'' under certain circumstances, on providing whatever information is
 
required to enable a recipient to replace the object code with a functioning
 
modified version.
 

	
 
This was a compromise that was difficult for the FSF to agree to during the
 
GPLv3 drafting process.  However, companies and governments that use
 
specialized or enterprise-level computer facilities reported that they
 
actually \textit{want} their systems not to be under their own control.
 
Rather than agreeing to this as a concession, or bowing to pressure, they ask
 
for this as a \texit{preference}.  It is not clear that GPL should interfere
 
for this as a \textit{preference}.  It is not clear that GPL should interfere
 
here, since the main problem lies elsewhere.
 

	
 
While imposing technical barriers to modification is wrong regardless of
 
circumstances, the areas where restricted devices are of the greatest
 
practical concern today fall within the User Product definition.  Most, if
 
not all, technically-restricted devices running GPL-covered programs are
 
consumer electronics devices.  Moreover, the disparity in clout between the
 
manufacturers and these users makes it difficult for the users to reject
 
technical restrictions through their weak and unorganized market power.  Even
 
limited to User Products, this provision addresses the fundamental problem.
 

	
 
% FIXME-LATER: link \href to USC 2301
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)