Changeset - 0bbf9ec882d0
[Not reviewed]
0 2 0
Martin Michlmayr (tbm) - 10 years ago 2014-04-24 23:12:21
tbm@cyrius.com
Misc copy editing
2 files changed with 21 insertions and 21 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
compliance-guide.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -74,3 +74,3 @@ reports, Welte successfully pursued many enforcements in Europe, including
 
formal legal action.  Harald earns the permanent fame as the first copyright
 
holder to bring legal action in a Court regarding GPL compliance. 
 
holder to bring legal action in a court regarding GPL compliance.
 

	
...
 
@@ -81,3 +81,3 @@ quite public, the vast majority of Conservancy's enforcement actions
 
are resolved privately via
 
cooperative communications with violators.  As both FSF and Conservancy has worked to bring
 
cooperative communications with violators.  As both FSF and Conservancy have worked to bring
 
individual companies into compliance, both organizations have encountered numerous
...
 
@@ -106,3 +106,3 @@ important requirements from the GPL.  These requirements are
 
carefully designed to uphold certain values and standards of the software
 
freedom community.  While the GPL's requirements may appear initially
 
freedom community.  While the GPL's requirements may initially appear
 
counter-intuitive to those more familiar with proprietary software
...
 
@@ -157,3 +157,3 @@ creative expression, no copyleft provisions are invoked.
 
Admittedly, a tiny
 
minority of situations which lie outside these two categories, and thus
 
minority of situations lie outside these two categories, and thus
 
do involve close questions about derivative and combined works.  Those
...
 
@@ -216,3 +216,3 @@ and have them include a brief description of how they will incorporate it
 
into the product.  Further, make sure developers use a revision control
 
system (such as Git or Mercurial), and have
 
system (such as Git or Mercurial), and
 
store the upstream versions of all software in a ``vendor branch'' or
...
 
@@ -230,5 +230,5 @@ there are few tools that are themselves Free Software.  Thus, GPL enforcers
 
usually recommend the GPL'd
 
\href{http://fossology.org/}{Fossology system}, which analyzes a
 
\href{http://fossology.org/}{FOSSology system}, which analyzes a
 
source code base and produces a list of Free Software licenses that may apply to
 
the code.  Fossology can help you build a catalog of the sources you have
 
the code.  FOSSology can help you build a catalog of the sources you have
 
already used to build your product.  You can then expand that into a more
...
 
@@ -256,3 +256,3 @@ developers are using revision control systems properly.
 
\item Have developers mark or ``tag'' the full source tree corresponding to
 
  builds distributed to customers
 
  builds distributed to customers.
 

	
...
 
@@ -512,3 +512,3 @@ distribution.
 
Finally, it is unacceptable to use option (b) merely because you do not have
 
Corresponding Source ready.  We find that some companies chose this option
 
Corresponding Source ready.  We find that some companies choose this option
 
because writing an offer is easy, but producing a source distribution as
...
 
@@ -518,3 +518,3 @@ market with an out-of-compliance product.  If you ship an offer for source
 
with your product but cannot actually deliver \emph{immediately} on that
 
offer when your customers receive it, you should expect an enforcement
 
offer when your customers request it, you should expect an enforcement
 
action.
...
 
@@ -525,3 +525,3 @@ As discussed in the last section, GPLv2~\S~3(c) and GPLv3~\S~6(c) apply
 
only to noncommercial use.  These options are not available to businesses
 
distributing GPL'd software.  Consequently, companies who redistribute
 
distributing GPL'd software.  Consequently, companies that redistribute
 
software packaged for them by an upstream vendor cannot merely pass along
...
 
@@ -755,3 +755,3 @@ with the license and respect freedom.
 
However, other entities who do not share the full ethos of software freedom
 
as institutionalized by FSF pursue GPL violations differently.  Oracle, a
 
as institutionalized by FSF and Conservancy pursue GPL violations differently.  Oracle, a
 
company that produces the GPL'd MySQL database, upon discovering GPL
...
 
@@ -759,3 +759,3 @@ violations typically negotiates a proprietary software license separately for
 
a fee.  While this practice is not one that FSF nor Conservancy would ever
 
consider undertaking or even endorsing, it is a legally way for copyright
 
consider undertaking or even endorsing, it is a legal way for copyright
 
holders to proceed.
...
 
@@ -763,9 +763,9 @@ holders to proceed.
 
Generally, GPL enforcers come in two varieties.  First, there are
 
Conservancy, FSF, and other ``community enforcers'', who primary seek the
 
Conservancy, FSF, and other ``community enforcers'', who primarily seek the
 
policy goals of GPL (software freedom), and see financial compensation as
 
ultimately secondary to those goals.  Second, there are ``for-profit
 
enforcers'' who use the GPL as a either a crippleware license, or sneakily
 
enforcers'' who use the GPL either as a crippleware license, or sneakily
 
induce infringement merely to gain proprietary licensing revenue.
 

	
 
Note that the latter model \textit{only} works for companies who hold 100\% of
 
Note that the latter model \textit{only} works for companies that hold 100\% of
 
the copyrights in the infringed work.  As such, multi-copyright-held works
...
 
@@ -967,3 +967,3 @@ should ask:
 
\item From which upstream vendors, be they companies or individuals, did
 
  \emph{you} receive your software from before distributing it to us?
 
  \emph{you} receive your software before distributing it to us?
 

	
...
 
@@ -1064,3 +1064,3 @@ ready-made for their products.
 
% LocalWords:  someone's downloadable subdirectory subdirectories filesystem
 
% LocalWords:  roadmap README upstream's Ravicher's Fossology readme CDs iPhone
 
% LocalWords:  roadmap README upstream's Ravicher's FOSSology readme CDs iPhone
 
% LocalWords:  makefiles violator's
enforcement-case-studies.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -124,3 +124,3 @@ gives them permission to engage in these activities governed by copyright law.
 
In conjunction with \S 4's termination of violators' rights, there is
 
one final industry fact added to the mix: rarely, does one engage in a
 
one final industry fact added to the mix: rarely does one engage in a
 
single, solitary act of copying, distributing or modifying software.
...
 
@@ -339,3 +339,3 @@ This case introduces a number of concepts regarding GPL enforcement.
 
\item {\bf Enforcement should not begin until the evidence is confirmed.}
 
  Most companies who distribute GPL'd software do so in compliance, and at
 
  Most companies that distribute GPL'd software do so in compliance, and at
 
  times, violation reports are mistaken. Even with extensive efforts in
...
 
@@ -638,3 +638,3 @@ did so, and the violation was resolved.
 
  No external argument for noncompliance can hold weight if the work as
 
  whole is indeed a derivative work of a GPL'd program.
 
  a whole is indeed a derivative work of a GPL'd program.
 

	
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)