Changeset - 07912cb5fc40
[Not reviewed]
0 1 0
Joshua Wells - 9 years ago 2014-12-20 23:34:44
gramex@openmailbox.org
Fix broken link
1 file changed with 1 insertions and 1 deletions:
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)
enforcement-case-studies.tex
Show inline comments
...
 
@@ -284,25 +284,25 @@ Fortunately, thanks in large part to the FSF's
 
    standards for RYF certification}, and among them is a pristine example of
 
  CCS\@.}, a few electronics products on the market meet
 
a higher standard of copyleft compliance.  As such, for the first
 
time in the history of copyleft, CCS experts have pristine examples to study
 
and present as exemplars worthy of emulation.
 

	
 
This case study therefore examines the entire life-cycle of a GPL compliance
 
investigation: from product purchase, to source request, to CCS review, and concluding
 
in a final compliance determination.
 
Specifically, this chapter discusses the purchase, CCS provision, and a
 
step-by-step build and installation analysis of a specific, physical,
 
embedded electronics product:
 
\href{https://www.thinkpenguin.com/gnu-linux/free-software-wireless-n-broadband-router-gnu-linux-tpe-nwifirouter}{the
 
\href{https://www.thinkpenguin.com/gnu-linux/free-software-wireless-n-broadband-router-gnu-linux-tpe-nwifirouter2}{the
 
  ``TPE-NWIFIROUTER'' wireless router by ThinkPenguin}.\footnote{The FSF of
 
  course performed a thorough CCS check as part of its certification process.
 
  The analysis discussed herein was independently performed by Software
 
  Freedom Conservancy without reviewing the FSF's findings.  Thus, this
 
  analysis is ``true to form'', and explains the typical procedures Conservancy
 
  uses when investigating a potential GPL violation.  In this case, obviously, no
 
  violation was uncovered.}
 

	
 
\section{Consumer Purchase and Unboxing}
 

	
 
The process for copyleft compliance investigation, when properly conducted,
 
determines whether users inclined to exercise their rights under a copyleft
0 comments (0 inline, 0 general)