From b8ec5dbbe92b355673810ba9453c70ce700b5988 2014-11-16 15:37:45 From: Mike Linksvayer Date: 2014-11-16 15:37:45 Subject: [PATCH] it indicate*s* --- diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex index c66717817ebee3c86200c1ad1af286e3921af6cc..a44f582c8fbbcfe792a49452a4e9878b4889740a 100644 --- a/gpl-lgpl.tex +++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex @@ -3300,7 +3300,7 @@ Thus, the three sentences in the center of GPLv3's User Product definition encapsulate the judicial and administrative principles established over the past three decades in the USA concerning the Magnuson-Moss consumer product definition. First, it states that doubtful cases are resolved in favor of -coverage under the definition. Second, it indicate that the words ``normally +coverage under the definition. Second, it indicates that the words ``normally used'' in the consumer product definition refer to a typical or common use of a class of product, and not the status of a particular user or expected or actual uses by a particular user. Third, it clearly states that the