From 39ead95e9bea9ac9b55d60d3d9aa6b580202b48a 2014-11-19 17:48:45 From: Bradley M. Kuhn Date: 2014-11-19 17:48:45 Subject: [PATCH] Rewrite paragraph to fix better with section. This paragraph was from text brought through from another document, and as such, while this section was built "around it", the text itself was stylistically different and otherwise problematic. This change brings it into form with the rest of the document. --- diff --git a/compliance-guide.tex b/compliance-guide.tex index 07cd4cd9291fb2fcbc09636b45b4e941843281b4..a85316168c45570544766223f7126bc557016a9f 100644 --- a/compliance-guide.tex +++ b/compliance-guide.tex @@ -1421,13 +1421,12 @@ to ``fix them'' for companies. Other such operators hold copyrights in some key piece of copylefted software and enforce as a mechanism to find out who is most likely to fund improvements on the software. -A few stories abound in the GPL enforcement community that companies have -often formed beneficial consulting or employment relationships with -developers they first encountered through enforcement. In some cases, -working together to alter the mode of use of the project's code in the -company's products was an explicit element in dispute resolution. More -often, the communication channels opened in the course of the inquiry served -other and more fruitful purposes later. +A few companies report that they have formed beneficial consulting or +employment relationships with developers they first encountered through +enforcement. In some such cases, companies have worked with such consultants +to alter the mode of use of the project's code in the company's products. +More often in these cases, the communication channels opened in the course of +the inquiry served other consulting purposes later. Feelings and opinions about this behavior are mixed within the larger copyleft community. Some see it as a reasonable business model and others