diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index 992a4ac4d98cc95a397053d028889f815eb9da25..0a8a81d5d134e5cf21406bcffc171fb34ecc15c8 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -1319,7 +1319,7 @@ originality to merit copyright protection.
 Portions of the source or object code of a computer program are rarely
 filtered out as unprotectable elements. However, some distinct parts of
 source and object code have been found unprotectable. For example,
-constant s, the invariable integers comprising part of formulas used to
+constants, the invariable integers comprising part of formulas used to
 perform calculations in a program, are unprotectable. Further, although
 common errors found in two programs can provide strong evidence of
 copying, they are not afforded any copyright protection over and above the
@@ -1412,7 +1412,7 @@ program, Oscar. About 30\% of Oscar was literally the same code as
 that in Adapter. After the suit began, the defendant rewrote those
 portions of Oscar that contained Adapter code in order to produce a new
 version of Oscar that was functionally competitive with Adapter, without
-have any literal copies of its code. Feeling slighted still, the
+having any literal copies of its code. Feeling slighted still, the
 plaintiff alleged that even the second version of Oscar, despite having no
 literally copied code, also infringed its copyrights. In addressing that
 question, the Second Circuit promulgated the AFC test.