diff --git a/comprehensive-gpl-guide.tex b/comprehensive-gpl-guide.tex
index fae95d74afa6e39e27c64ab7fb0e8b75d542e9f0..6dec8e387c0367138872f88ddc2e567e094a008f 100644
--- a/comprehensive-gpl-guide.tex
+++ b/comprehensive-gpl-guide.tex
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ and Guide
 \begin{tabbing}
 Copyright \= \copyright{} 2003--2005, 2008, 2014--2015, 2018 \hspace{1.mm} \=  \kill
 Copyright \> \copyright{} 2018 \>  Chestek Legal. \\
-Copyright \> \copyright{} 2003--2005, 2008, 2014--2015 \>  Bradley M. Kuhn. \\
+Copyright \> \copyright{} 2003--2005, 2008, 2014--2015, 2018 \>  Bradley M. Kuhn. \\
 Copyright \> \copyright{} 2014--2015 \>  Anthony K. Sebro, Jr. \\
 Copyright \= \copyright{} 2014 \> Denver Gingerich. \\
 Copyright \= \copyright{} 2003--2007, 2014 \>  Free Software Foundation, Inc. \\
diff --git a/gpl-lgpl.tex b/gpl-lgpl.tex
index 57413219730fc335119c60ffc255fb96041d3c6c..4f1586c1595cc03f6b39bc7bb7a979574d571d54 100644
--- a/gpl-lgpl.tex
+++ b/gpl-lgpl.tex
@@ -2160,7 +2160,8 @@ GPLv2~\S4 is GPLv2's termination clause.  Upon first examination, it seems
 strange that a license with the goal of defending users' and programmers'
 freedoms for perpetuity in an irrevocable way would have such a clause.
 However, upon further examination, the difference between irrevocability
-and this termination clause becomes clear.
+and this termination clause becomes clear. (See~\ref{gplv2-irrevocable} for
+expanded discussion of GPLv2 irrevocability.)
 
 The GPL is irrevocable in the sense that once a copyright holder grants
 rights for someone to copy, modify and redistribute the software under terms
@@ -2321,7 +2322,10 @@ rights\footnote{While nearly all attorneys and copyleft theorists are in
   decade, regard an almost moot and wholly esoteric legal detail.}.
 
 \section{GPLv2 Irrevocability}
+\label{gplv2-irrevocable}
 
+This section digresses briefly to examine the manner in which GPLv2\S\S~4--6
+interact together to assure that the license grant is irrevocable.
 There are two legal theories why a contributor cannot terminate their license
 grant. First is an argument that the text of the GPL prevents it; second is
 that a contributor would be estopped from succeeding on an infringement claim